These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30216130)

  • 21. In your dental practice, is dental amalgam still the restorative material of choice?
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Aug; 133(8):1046. PubMed ID: 12198982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. State-of-the-art techniques in operative dentistry: contemporary teaching of posterior composites in UK and Irish dental schools.
    Lynch CD; Frazier KB; McConnell RJ; Blum IR; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 Aug; 209(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 20706252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The transition from amalgam to other restorative materials in the U.S. predoctoral pediatric dentistry clinics.
    Kateeb ET; Warren JJ
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Aug; 5(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 31452952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Makhija SK; Gordan VV; Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Rindal DB; Pihlstrom DJ; Qvist V;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 142(6):622-32. PubMed ID: 21628683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trends in the placement of posterior composites in dental schools.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ; Wilson NH
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Mar; 71(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 17389577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching.
    Brunton PA; Burke FJ; Sharif MO; Creanor S; Hosey MT; Mannocci F; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2012 Jan; 212(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 22281627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical longevity of extensive direct resin composite restorations after amalgam replacement with a mean follow-up of 15 years.
    Hofsteenge JW; Scholtanus JD; Özcan M; Nolte IM; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104409. PubMed ID: 36623686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
    Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 28937890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations.
    Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF
    J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Randall RC; Meyers IA; Pitt J; Hall AC
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 15762339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Composite Restorations: Wheels of Progress Continue to Turn.
    Vakay R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Jun; 36(6):442-3. PubMed ID: 26053784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Teaching Class I and Class II direct composite restorations: results of a survey of dental schools.
    Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 129(10):1415-21. PubMed ID: 9787538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Teaching of posterior composite restorations in Japanese dental schools.
    Fukushima M; Iwaku M; Setcos JC; Wilson NH; Mjör IA
    Int Dent J; 2000 Dec; 50(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 11197202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.