These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30216130)

  • 61. Behaviour of general dental practitioners in Germany regarding posterior restorations with flowable composites.
    Seemann R; Pfefferkorn F; Hickel R
    Int Dent J; 2011 Oct; 61(5):252-6. PubMed ID: 21995372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Teaching the placement of posterior resin-based composite restorations in U.S. dental schools.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 May; 137(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 16739541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam.
    Dlugokinski M; Browning WD
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
    Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A fascinating insight.
    D'Cruz L
    Br Dent J; 2012 Apr; 212(8):356. PubMed ID: 22538881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Better prepared.
    Radford DR; Woolford MW; Dunne SM; Holmes S
    Br Dent J; 2012 Jul; 213(2):47. PubMed ID: 22836395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss.
    Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Dentists' perspective about dental amalgam: current use and future direction.
    Bakhurji E; Scott T; Mangione T; Sohn W
    J Public Health Dent; 2017 Jun; 77(3):207-215. PubMed ID: 28070905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Composite veneering of complex amalgam restorations.
    Demarco FF; Zanchi CH; Bueno M; Piva E
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17288335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Current and future trends in the teaching of direct posterior resin composites in Malaysian dental schools: a cross-sectional study.
    Sidhu P; Sultan OS; Math SY; Malik NA; Wilson NHF; Lynch CD; Blum IR; Daood U
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103683. PubMed ID: 33957189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE; Cho GC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Amalgam Phase-Down Part 1: UK-Based Posterior Restorative Material and Technique Use.
    Bailey O; Vernazza CR; Stone S; Ternent L; Roche AG; Lynch C
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2022 Jan; 7(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 33300416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania.
    Brunton PA; Ghazali A; Tarif ZH; Loch C; Lynch C; Wilson N; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():62-67. PubMed ID: 28232082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.