These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30217291)

  • 1. Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres.
    Yin S; Ma SN; Zhang YQ; Shi TY; Xiang LB; Ren YL; Zang RY
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):380-386. PubMed ID: 30217291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
    Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Urodynamics and Survival Outcomes of Different Methods of Dissecting the Inferior Hypogastric Plexus in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy of Type C: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 30759291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
    Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
    Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of postoperative bladder function and prognosis after modified nerve sparing radical hysterectomy].
    Wenwen W; Bin L; Jing Z; Gongyi Z; Yeduo Y; Hongmei Z; Xiaoguang L; Lingying W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25030730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
    Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
    Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.
    van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
    Tseng CJ; Shen HP; Lin YH; Lee CY; Wei-Cheng Chiu W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 22482969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical outcomes of patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Mahawerawat S; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J; Khunamornpong S; Suprasert P; Sae-Teng CT
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5375-8. PubMed ID: 24175829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique for cervical cancer using the paravesico-vaginal space as a new surgical landmark.
    Zhang Y; Shi T; Yin S; Ma S; Shi D; Guan J; Xiang L; Liu Y; Ren Y; Tan D; Zang R
    Oncotarget; 2017 Oct; 8(52):90413-90420. PubMed ID: 29163840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a minimum 12 months' follow-up study.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Nardelli F; Ghezzi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 24552894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function.
    Sakuragi N; Todo Y; Kudo M; Yamamoto R; Sato T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 15823132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.