These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30217291)
101. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
102. Comparison of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Xue Z; Zhu X; Teng Y Cell Physiol Biochem; 2016; 38(5):1841-50. PubMed ID: 27160267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
103. Sexuality and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A prospective study. Novackova M; Pastor Z; Chmel R; Mala I; Chmel R Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 61(4):641-645. PubMed ID: 35779914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
104. Radical hysterectomy: a critical review of twenty-two years' experience. Underwood PB; Wilson WC; Kreutner A; Miller MC; Murphy E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Aug; 134(8):889-98. PubMed ID: 463994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
105. Survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: A 9-year study. Siesto G; Finco A; Portuesi RAV; Romano F; Ieda' NP; Vitobello D Int J Med Robot; 2019 Aug; 15(4):e2003. PubMed ID: 31039279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
106. Identification and injury to the inferior hypogastric plexus in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Li L; Bi Y; Wang L; Mao X; Kraemer B; Lang J; Cui Q; Wu M Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13260. PubMed ID: 31519975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
107. [Treatment of cervical cancer in the Republic of Srpska]. Lucić N; Antonić Z; Ećim V; Draganović D; Latinović L Med Pregl; 2011; 64(11-12):588-91. PubMed ID: 22369006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
108. Early removal of indwelling urinary catheter after radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer-A cohort study. Mengatto MF; Castro BGR; Nobrega L; Vieira MA; Andrade CEMC; Tsunoda AT; de Andrade DAP; Dos Reis R J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(7):1498-1505. PubMed ID: 32779228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
109. Urodynamic outcomes after pelvic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tsunetoh S; Terai Y; Takai M; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Tanaka T; Sasaki H; Ibuki N; Ubai T; Yamamoto K; Azuma H; Ohmichi M Oncotarget; 2019 Aug; 10(50):5207-5216. PubMed ID: 31497250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
110. Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lee SH; Bae JW; Han M; Cho YJ; Park JW; Oh SR; Kim SJ; Choe SY; Yun JH; Lee Y Mol Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 12(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 31929888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
113. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage. Balaya V; Guani B; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F; On Behalf Of The Senticol Group Cancers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33260758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
114. Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Makowski M; Nowak M; Szpakowski M; Władziński J; Serwach-Nowińska A; Janas Ł; Wilczyński JR Prz Menopauzalny; 2014 Jun; 13(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 26327852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
115. Perineural invasion in cervical cancer: pay attention to the indications of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Zhu Y; Zhang GN; Shi Y; Cui L; Leng XF; Huang JM Ann Transl Med; 2019 May; 7(9):203. PubMed ID: 31205921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
116. Piver Type II vs. Type III Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Midterm Follow-up Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Sun H; Cao D; Shen K; Yang J; Xiang Y; Feng F; Wu L; Zhang Z; Ling B; Song L Front Oncol; 2018; 8():568. PubMed ID: 30555800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
117. Tailoring parametrectomy for early cervical cancer (Stage IA-IIA FIGO): a review on surgical, oncologic outcome and sexual function. Plotti F; Ficarola F; Messina G; Terranova C; Montera R; Guzzo F; DE Cicco Nardone C; Rossini G; Schirò T; Gatti A; Luvero D; Feole L; Angioli R Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 33249819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
118. Impact of timing of urinary catheter removal on voiding dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. Huepenbecker S; Santía MC; Harrison R; Dos Reis R; Pareja R; Iniesta MD; Meyer LA; Frumovitz M; Zorrilla-Vaca A; Ramirez PT Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35803608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
120. The Diagnosis of Perineural Invasion: A Crucial Factor in Novel Algorithm of Coexistence of Conventional and Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy. Skręt A; Skręt-Magierło JE; Książek M; Gawlik B; Bielatowicz J; Barnaś E Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34441243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]