BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30217304)

  • 1. Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhao W; Liu C; Li S; Geng D; Feng Y; Sun M
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 30217304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Up-to-date comparison of robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
    Zhou J; Lv Z; Zou H; Xiong L; Liu Z; Chen W; Wen Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jun; 99(23):e20435. PubMed ID: 32501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Niu X; Yu B; Yao L; Tian J; Guo T; Ma S; Cai H
    Asian J Surg; 2019 Jan; 42(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 30337121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do patients benefit more from robot assisted approach than conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? A meta-analysis of perioperative and economic outcomes.
    Xu SB; Jia CK; Wang JR; Zhang RC; Mou YP
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 118(1 Pt 2):268-278. PubMed ID: 29798819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.
    Zhou JY; Xin C; Mou YP; Xu XW; Zhang MZ; Zhou YC; Lu C; Chen RG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151189. PubMed ID: 26974961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
    Zhang H; Lan X; Peng B; Li B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5711-5731. PubMed ID: 31602170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Totally laparoscopic or robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open surgery for periampullary neoplasms: separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Shin SH; Kim YJ; Song KB; Kim SR; Hwang DW; Lee JH; Park KM; Lee YJ; Jun E; Kim SC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3459-3474. PubMed ID: 28039645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections.
    Boggi U; Napoli N; Costa F; Kauffmann EF; Menonna F; Iacopi S; Vistoli F; Amorese G
    World J Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2497-506. PubMed ID: 27206401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Peng L; Lin S; Li Y; Xiao W
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3085-3097. PubMed ID: 27928665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Chen K; Pan Y; Huang CJ; Chen QL; Zhang RC; Zhang MZ; Wang GY; Wang XF; Mou YP; Yan JF
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):382. PubMed ID: 33836678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of short-term clinical outcome between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy].
    Li WK; Ma FH; Liu H; Li Y; Ma S; Kang WZ; Zhong YX; Xie YB; Tian YT
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 42(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 32575947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of multiple worldwide centers.
    Zhang W; Huang Z; Zhang J; Che X
    Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):893-907. PubMed ID: 33159662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study.
    Chen S; Chen JZ; Zhan Q; Deng XX; Shen BY; Peng CH; Li HW
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3698-711. PubMed ID: 25761559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.
    Daouadi M; Zureikat AH; Zenati MS; Choudry H; Tsung A; Bartlett DL; Hughes SJ; Lee KK; Moser AJ; Zeh HJ
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jan; 257(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 22868357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
    Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
    Yan Q; Xu LB; Ren ZF; Liu C
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 31848756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.
    Nakamura M; Nakashima H
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2013 Apr; 20(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 23224732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy as minimally invasive surgery for periampullary tumors: a comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Mendoza AS; Han HS; Yoon YS; Cho JY; Choi Y
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):819-24. PubMed ID: 26455716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedure-specific Training for Robot-assisted Distal Pancreatectomy.
    Klompmaker S; van der Vliet WJ; Thoolen SJ; Ore AS; Verkoulen K; Solis-Velasco M; Canacari EG; Kruskal JB; Khwaja KO; Tseng JF; Callery MP; Kent TS; Moser AJ
    Ann Surg; 2021 Jul; 274(1):e18-e27. PubMed ID: 30946088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
    van Hilst J; de Rooij T; Klompmaker S; Rawashdeh M; Aleotti F; Al-Sarireh B; Alseidi A; Ateeb Z; Balzano G; Berrevoet F; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Busch OR; Butturini G; Casadei R; Del Chiaro M; Chikhladze S; Cipriani F; van Dam R; Damoli I; van Dieren S; Dokmak S; Edwin B; van Eijck C; Fabre JM; Falconi M; Farges O; Fernández-Cruz L; Forgione A; Frigerio I; Fuks D; Gavazzi F; Gayet B; Giardino A; Groot Koerkamp B; Hackert T; Hassenpflug M; Kabir I; Keck T; Khatkov I; Kusar M; Lombardo C; Marchegiani G; Marshall R; Menon KV; Montorsi M; Orville M; de Pastena M; Pietrabissa A; Poves I; Primrose J; Pugliese R; Ricci C; Roberts K; Røsok B; Sahakyan MA; Sánchez-Cabús S; Sandström P; Scovel L; Solaini L; Soonawalla Z; Souche FR; Sutcliffe RP; Tiberio GA; Tomazic A; Troisi R; Wellner U; White S; Wittel UA; Zerbi A; Bassi C; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jan; 269(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 29099399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.