318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30217432)
1. Phase II study of intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy using registered ultrasound and fluoroscopy.
Lee J; Hobbs RF; Zahurak M; Ng SK; Zhang Z; Burdette EC; DeWeese TL; Song DY
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(6):858-865. PubMed ID: 30217432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative Registered Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (iRUF) for dose calculation during prostate brachytherapy: Improved accuracy compared to standard ultrasound-based dosimetry.
Lee J; Mian OY; Le Y; Bae HJ; Burdette EC; DeWeese TL; Prince JL; Song DY
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Jul; 124(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 28647400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate brachytherapy intraoperative dosimetry using a combination of radiographic seed localization with a C-arm and deformed ultrasound prostate contours.
Golshan M; Mahdavi SS; Samei G; Lobo J; Pickles T; James Morris W; Keyes M; Peacock M; Salcudean SE; Spadinger I
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):589-598. PubMed ID: 32682777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superior Postimplant Dosimetry Achieved Using Dynamic Intraoperative Dosimetry for Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy.
Singh T; Lee J; Zahurak M; Bae HJ; Habtu T; Hobbs R; Le Y; Burdette EC; Song DY
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2021; 11(4):264-271. PubMed ID: 33722782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy.
Stone NN; Hong S; Lo YC; Howard V; Stock RG
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15062159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy.
Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computing intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy using TRUS and fluoroscopy.
French D; Morris J; Keyes M; Goksel O; Salcudean S
Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1262-72. PubMed ID: 16179203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: a dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases.
Fuller DB; Jin H; Koziol JA; Feng AC
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 16182221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative ultrasound-fluoroscopy fusion can enhance prostate brachytherapy quality.
Orio PF; Tutar IB; Narayanan S; Arthurs S; Cho PS; Kim Y; Merrick G; Wallner KE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):302-7. PubMed ID: 17707285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative fluoroscopic dose assessment in prostate brachytherapy patients.
Reed DR; Wallner KE; Narayanan S; Sutlief SG; Ford EC; Cho PS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):301-7. PubMed ID: 16111600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time intraoperative evaluation of implant quality and dose correction during prostate brachytherapy consistently improves target coverage using a novel image fusion and optimization program.
Zelefsky MJ; Cohen GN; Taggar AS; Kollmeier M; McBride S; Mageras G; Zaider M
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(5):319-324. PubMed ID: 28377139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of real-time intraoperative ultrasound-based dosimetry with postoperative computed tomography-based dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy.
Nag S; Shi P; Liu B; Gupta N; Bahnson RR; Wang JZ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 17996395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New approach of ultra-focal brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer with custom-linked I-125 seeds: A feasibility study of optimal dose coverage.
Brun T; Bachaud JM; Graff-Cailleaud P; Malavaud B; Portalez D; Popotte C; Aziza R; Lusque A; Filleron T; Ken S
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(3):544-555. PubMed ID: 29525514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound with postimplant computed tomography--dosimetric values at Day 1 and Day 30 after prostate brachytherapy.
Ohashi T; Yorozu A; Toya K; Saito S; Momma T; Nagata H; Kosugi M; Shigematsu N; Kubo A
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 17959425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver variability of 3.0-tesla and 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
Watanabe K; Katayama N; Katsui K; Matsushita T; Takamoto A; Ihara H; Nasu Y; Takemoto M; Kuroda M; Kanazawa S
J Radiat Res; 2019 Jul; 60(4):483-489. PubMed ID: 31083713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
