BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30218280)

  • 1. The significant value of predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer using
    Xu J; Li Y; Hu S; Lu L; Gao Z; Yuan H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 30218280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic role of metabolic 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and hematological prognostic indicators in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Cengiz A; Yersal Ö; Ömürlü İK; Yürekli Y
    Indian J Cancer; 2023; 60(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 37530245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of
    Oner AO; Budak ES; Yıldırım S; Aydın F; Sezer C
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 28697193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and correlation with PET-CT metabolic parameters in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
    Mirili C; Guney IB; Paydas S; Seydaoglu G; Kapukaya TK; Ogul A; Gokcay S; Buyuksimsek M; Yetisir AE; Karaalioglu B; Tohumcuoglu M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 24(2):168-178. PubMed ID: 30109543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive Value of Metabolic Parameters Derived From
    Liu H; Ye Z; Yang T; Xie H; Duan T; Li M; Wu M; Song B
    Front Immunol; 2021; 12():724464. PubMed ID: 34512653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic impact of the
    Goksel S; Cengiz A; Ozturk H; Yurekli Y
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(4):925-930. PubMed ID: 34528543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pretreatment quantitative
    Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
    Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
    Lee JW; Kang CM; Choi HJ; Lee WJ; Song SY; Lee JH; Lee JD
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 24711649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis.
    Son SH; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Song BI; Chae YS; Ahn BC; Lee J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 26204115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
    Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
    Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prognostic value of
    Grut H; Dueland S; Line PD; Revheim ME
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Feb; 45(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29026950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volumetric parameters on
    Liu G; Hu Y; Cheng X; Wang Y; Gu Y; Liu T; Shi H
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 31395059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters Measured by Pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
    Son SH; Kang SM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee SJ; Lee J; Ahn BC
    Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 41(6):e266-73. PubMed ID: 27055144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between
    McSorley ST; Khor BY; Tsang K; Colville D; Han S; Horgan PG; McMillan DC
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 May; 20(5):407-415. PubMed ID: 29178362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elevated tumor-to-liver uptake ratio (TLR) from
    Huang J; Huang L; Zhou J; Duan Y; Zhang Z; Wang X; Huang P; Tan S; Hu P; Wang J; Huang M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1958-1968. PubMed ID: 28812134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of distant metastasis and survival in adenoid cystic carcinoma using quantitative
    Lim WS; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Kim SJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Oral Oncol; 2018 Feb; 77():98-104. PubMed ID: 29362133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between
    Liu X; Wang SC; Ni M; Xie Q; Zhang YF; Lv WF; Geng GY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Apr; 47(4):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 35138462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.