These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30218280)
1. The significant value of predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer using Xu J; Li Y; Hu S; Lu L; Gao Z; Yuan H Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 30218280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic role of metabolic 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and hematological prognostic indicators in patients with colorectal cancer. Cengiz A; Yersal Ö; Ömürlü İK; Yürekli Y Indian J Cancer; 2023; 60(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 37530245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of Oner AO; Budak ES; Yıldırım S; Aydın F; Sezer C Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 28697193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and correlation with PET-CT metabolic parameters in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Mirili C; Guney IB; Paydas S; Seydaoglu G; Kapukaya TK; Ogul A; Gokcay S; Buyuksimsek M; Yetisir AE; Karaalioglu B; Tohumcuoglu M Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 24(2):168-178. PubMed ID: 30109543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive Value of Metabolic Parameters Derived From Liu H; Ye Z; Yang T; Xie H; Duan T; Li M; Wu M; Song B Front Immunol; 2021; 12():724464. PubMed ID: 34512653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic impact of the Goksel S; Cengiz A; Ozturk H; Yurekli Y J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(4):925-930. PubMed ID: 34528543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pretreatment quantitative Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Lee JW; Kang CM; Choi HJ; Lee WJ; Song SY; Lee JH; Lee JD J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 24711649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis. Son SH; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Song BI; Chae YS; Ahn BC; Lee J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 26204115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prognostic value of Grut H; Dueland S; Line PD; Revheim ME Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Feb; 45(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29026950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric parameters on Liu G; Hu Y; Cheng X; Wang Y; Gu Y; Liu T; Shi H BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 31395059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters Measured by Pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Son SH; Kang SM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee SJ; Lee J; Ahn BC Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 41(6):e266-73. PubMed ID: 27055144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between McSorley ST; Khor BY; Tsang K; Colville D; Han S; Horgan PG; McMillan DC Colorectal Dis; 2018 May; 20(5):407-415. PubMed ID: 29178362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elevated tumor-to-liver uptake ratio (TLR) from Huang J; Huang L; Zhou J; Duan Y; Zhang Z; Wang X; Huang P; Tan S; Hu P; Wang J; Huang M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1958-1968. PubMed ID: 28812134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of distant metastasis and survival in adenoid cystic carcinoma using quantitative Lim WS; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Kim SJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY Oral Oncol; 2018 Feb; 77():98-104. PubMed ID: 29362133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between Liu X; Wang SC; Ni M; Xie Q; Zhang YF; Lv WF; Geng GY Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Apr; 47(4):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 35138462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]