438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30218382)
1. Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.
Pesapane F; Czarniecki M; Suter MB; Turkbey B; Villeirs G
Med Oncol; 2018 Sep; 35(11):148. PubMed ID: 30218382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Final analysis of a prospective trial on functional imaging for nodal staging in patients with prostate cancer at high risk for lymph node involvement.
Van den Bergh L; Lerut E; Haustermans K; Deroose CM; Oyen R; Isebaert S; Budiharto T; Ameye F; Mottaghy FM; Bogaerts K; Van Poppel H; Joniau S
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e23-31. PubMed ID: 25655681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of PET/CT and MR lymphography in treatment of prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastases.
Fortuin AS; Deserno WM; Meijer HJ; Jager GJ; Takahashi S; Debats OA; Reske SN; Schick C; Krause BJ; van Oort I; Witjes AJ; Hoogeveen YL; van Lin EN; Barentsz JO
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):712-8. PubMed ID: 22417806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [18F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 210 patients.
Poulsen MH; Bouchelouche K; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Petersen H; Gerke O; Steffansen SI; Marcussen N; Svolgaard N; Vach W; Geertsen U; Walter S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1666-71. PubMed ID: 22520686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between conventional imaging (abdominal-pelvic computed tomography and bone scan) and [(18)F]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for the initial staging of patients with intermediate- tohigh-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis.
Evangelista L; Cimitan M; Zattoni F; Guttilla A; Zattoni F; Saladini G
Scand J Urol; 2015; 49(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 25649494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: comparison of 11C-choline PET/CT with pelvic multiparametric MR imaging with endorectal coil.
Kitajima K; Murphy RC; Nathan MA; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 24434294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the nodal staging of prostate cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastases.
Budiharto T; Joniau S; Lerut E; Van den Bergh L; Mottaghy F; Deroose CM; Oyen R; Ameye F; Bogaerts K; Haustermans K; Van Poppel H
Eur Urol; 2011 Jul; 60(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 21292388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Abrams-Pompe RS; Fanti S; Schoots IG; Moore CM; Turkbey B; Vickers AJ; Walz J; Steuber T; Eastham JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Jun; 4(3):370-395. PubMed ID: 33272865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DW-MRI) vs choline-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (choline-PET/CT) for selecting treatments in recurrent prostate cancer.
Conde-Moreno AJ; Herrando-Parreño G; Muelas-Soria R; Ferrer-Rebolleda J; Broseta-Torres R; Cozar-Santiago MP; García-Piñón F; Ferrer-Albiach C
Clin Transl Oncol; 2017 May; 19(5):553-561. PubMed ID: 27796820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New Clinical Indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, New Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography and a Promising Hybrid Device for Prostate Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Evangelista L; Briganti A; Fanti S; Joniau S; Reske S; Schiavina R; Stief C; Thalmann GN; Picchio M
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 26850970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging the High-risk Prostate Cancer Patient: Current and Future Approaches to Staging.
Bjurlin MA; Turkbey B; Rosenkrantz AB; Gaur S; Choyke PL; Taneja SS
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():3-12. PubMed ID: 29545055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molecular and functional imaging for detection of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.
Fortuin A; Rooij Md; Zamecnik P; Haberkorn U; Barentsz J
Int J Mol Sci; 2013 Jul; 14(7):13842-75. PubMed ID: 23823804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of
Basso Dias A; Finelli A; Bauman G; Veit-Haibach P; Berlin A; Ortega C; Avery L; Metser U
Radiology; 2022 Sep; 304(3):600-608. PubMed ID: 35608445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
Schmidt GP; Kramer H; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nodal staging.
Ganeshalingam S; Koh DM
Cancer Imaging; 2009 Dec; 9(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 20080453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.
Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.
Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Efficacy of (68)Gallium-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography Compared to Conventional Imaging for Lymph Node Staging of 130 Consecutive Patients with Intermediate to High Risk Prostate Cancer.
Maurer T; Gschwend JE; Rauscher I; Souvatzoglou M; Haller B; Weirich G; Wester HJ; Heck M; Kübler H; Beer AJ; Schwaiger M; Eiber M
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1436-1443. PubMed ID: 26682756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
