405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30218548)
1. Overlooked climate parameters best predict flowering onset: Assessing phenological models using the elastic net.
Park IW; Mazer SJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5972-5984. PubMed ID: 30218548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Herbarium records are reliable sources of phenological change driven by climate and provide novel insights into species' phenological cueing mechanisms.
Davis CC; Willis CG; Connolly B; Kelly C; Ellison AM
Am J Bot; 2015 Oct; 102(10):1599-609. PubMed ID: 26451038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advancing frost dates have reduced frost risk among most North American angiosperms since 1980.
Park IW; Ramirez-Parada T; Mazer SJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Jan; 27(1):165-176. PubMed ID: 33030240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maintenance of temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate.
Iler AM; Inouye DW; Høye TT; Miller-Rushing AJ; Burkle LA; Johnston EB
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Aug; 19(8):2348-59. PubMed ID: 23640772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Herbarium specimens reveal the footprint of climate change on flowering trends across north-central North America.
Calinger KM; Queenborough S; Curtis PS
Ecol Lett; 2013 Aug; 16(8):1037-44. PubMed ID: 23786499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Climate drives phenological reassembly of a mountain wildflower meadow community.
Theobald EJ; Breckheimer I; HilleRisLambers J
Ecology; 2017 Nov; 98(11):2799-2812. PubMed ID: 29023677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phenological mismatch with abiotic conditions implications for flowering in Arctic plants.
Wheeler HC; Høye TT; Schmidt NM; Svenning JC; Forchhammer MC
Ecology; 2015 Mar; 96(3):775-87. PubMed ID: 26236873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phenological change in a spring ephemeral: implications for pollination and plant reproduction.
Gezon ZJ; Inouye DW; Irwin RE
Glob Chang Biol; 2016 May; 22(5):1779-93. PubMed ID: 26833694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flowering date of taxonomic families predicts phenological sensitivity to temperature: Implications for forecasting the effects of climate change on unstudied taxa.
Mazer SJ; Travers SE; Cook BI; Davies TJ; Bolmgren K; Kraft NJ; Salamin N; Inouye DW
Am J Bot; 2013 Jul; 100(7):1381-97. PubMed ID: 23752756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spring- and fall-flowering species show diverging phenological responses to climate in the Southeast USA.
Pearson KD
Int J Biometeorol; 2019 Apr; 63(4):481-492. PubMed ID: 30734127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Old Plants, New Tricks: Phenological Research Using Herbarium Specimens.
Willis CG; Ellwood ER; Primack RB; Davis CC; Pearson KD; Gallinat AS; Yost JM; Nelson G; Mazer SJ; Rossington NL; Sparks TH; Soltis PS
Trends Ecol Evol; 2017 Jul; 32(7):531-546. PubMed ID: 28465044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PhenoForecaster: A software package for the prediction of flowering phenology.
Park I; Jones A; Mazer SJ
Appl Plant Sci; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e01230. PubMed ID: 30937222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Substantial shifts in flowering phenology of Sternbergia vernalis in the Himalaya: Supplementing decadal field records with historical and experimental evidences.
Hassan T; Hamid M; Wani SA; Malik AH; Waza SA; Khuroo AA
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 795():148811. PubMed ID: 34246140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrasting effects of warming and increased snowfall on Arctic tundra plant phenology over the past two decades.
Bjorkman AD; Elmendorf SC; Beamish AL; Vellend M; Henry GH
Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Dec; 21(12):4651-61. PubMed ID: 26216538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flowering phenological changes in relation to climate change in Hungary.
Szabó B; Vincze E; Czúcz B
Int J Biometeorol; 2016 Sep; 60(9):1347-56. PubMed ID: 26768142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extirpated prairie species demonstrate more variable phenological responses to warming than extant congeners.
Zettlemoyer MA; Renaldi K; Muzyka MD; Lau JA
Am J Bot; 2021 Jun; 108(6):958-970. PubMed ID: 34133754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond the usual climate? Factors determining flowering and fruiting phenology across a genus over 117 years.
Bartlett KB; Austin MW; Beck JB; Zanne AE; Smith AB
Am J Bot; 2023 Jul; 110(7):e16188. PubMed ID: 37200535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changing Climate Drives Divergent and Nonlinear Shifts in Flowering Phenology across Elevations.
Rafferty NE; Diez JM; Bertelsen CD
Curr Biol; 2020 Feb; 30(3):432-441.e3. PubMed ID: 31902725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Historical changes in flowering phenology are governed by temperature × precipitation interactions in a widespread perennial herb in western North America.
Matthews ER; Mazer SJ
New Phytol; 2016 Apr; 210(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 26595165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of herbarium and citizen science phenology datasets for detecting response of flowering time to climate change in Denmark.
Iwanycki Ahlstrand N; Primack RB; Tøttrup AP
Int J Biometeorol; 2022 May; 66(5):849-862. PubMed ID: 35235036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
