These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30219542)
1. Survival after bilateral internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting: Are women at risk? Saraiva FA; Girerd N; Cerqueira RJ; Ferreira JP; Vilas-Boas N; Pinho P; Barros A; Amorim MJ; Lourenço AP; Leite-Moreira AF Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():89-95. PubMed ID: 30219542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival After Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery In Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Are Women at Risk? A Saraiva F; Girerd N; J Cerqueira R; P Ferreira J; Vilas-Boas N; Pinho P; Barros A; J Amorim M; Lourenço A; F Leite-Moreira A Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2017; 24(3-4):101. PubMed ID: 29701335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts. Rosenblum JM; Harskamp RE; Hoedemaker N; Walker P; Liberman HA; de Winter RJ; Vassiliades TA; Puskas JD; Halkos ME J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1081-9. PubMed ID: 26687889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting reverses the negative influence of gender on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Zucker M; Ebra G Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 44(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 23389478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Matched Analysis. Zhu YY; Seco M; Harris SR; Koullouros M; Ramponi F; Wilson M; Bannon PG; Vallely MP Heart Lung Circ; 2019 May; 28(5):807-813. PubMed ID: 30126790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronary Revascularization With Single Versus Bilateral Mammary Arteries: Is It Time to Change? DeSimone JP; Malenka DJ; Weldner PW; Iribarne A; Leavitt BJ; McCullough JN; Quinn RD; Schmoker JD; Kramer RS; Baribeau Y; Klemperer JD; Sardella GL; Olmstead EM; Ross CS; DiScipio AW; Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Aug; 106(2):466-472. PubMed ID: 29550203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Yi G; Shine B; Rehman SM; Altman DG; Taggart DP Circulation; 2014 Aug; 130(7):539-45. PubMed ID: 24916209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early Outcome of Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in the Elderly. Rubino AS; Gatti G; Reichart D; Tauriainen T; De Feo M; Onorati F; Pappalardo A; Chocron S; Gulbins H; Dalén M; Svenarud P; Faggian G; Franzese I; Santarpino G; Fischlein T; Maselli D; Nardella S; Gherli R; Ahmed A; Santini F; Salsano A; Nicolini F; Zanobini M; Saccocci M; Ruggieri VG; Bounader K; Mignosa C; D'Errigo P; Rosato S; Airaksinen J; Perrotti A; Biancari F Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 105(6):1717-1723. PubMed ID: 29410264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of using a radial artery in patients already receiving bilateral internal mammary arteries during coronary bypass grafting: 30-day outcomes and 14-year survival in a propensity-matched cohort. Grau JB; Kuschner CE; Johnson CK; Ferrari G; Zapolanski A; Brizzio ME; Shaw RE Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 26003960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis. Buttar SN; Yan TD; Taggart DP; Tian DH Heart; 2017 Sep; 103(18):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 28646103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in the Elderly: Long-Term Survival Benefit. Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Ebra G Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 100(4):1374-81; discussion 1381-2. PubMed ID: 26228600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Propensity-matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery vs single internal mammary artery in 7702 cases of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Saito A; Miyata H; Motomura N; Ono M; Takamoto S; Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 44(4):711-7. PubMed ID: 23543203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the Radial Artery as an Additional Arterial Conduit During In-Situ Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Mohammadi S; Dagenais F; Voisine P; Dumont E; Charbonneau E; Marzouk M; Paramythiotis A; Kalavrouziotis D Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):913-8. PubMed ID: 26576749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bilateral versus single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting in Sweden from 1997-2008. Dalén M; Ivert T; Holzmann MJ; Sartipy U PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86929. PubMed ID: 24466293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups. Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Zucker M; Ebra G Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jul; 90(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 20609757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predominant Use of Bilateral Internal Mammary Arteries in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Tavilla G; Islam MA; Malhotra A; Reddy RC; Beckles DL Am J Cardiol; 2024 Aug; 225():134-141. PubMed ID: 38885919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Endo M; Nishida H; Tomizawa Y; Kasanuki H Circulation; 2001 Oct; 104(18):2164-70. PubMed ID: 11684625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impacts of Skeletonized Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting on the Risk of Deep Sternal Wound Infection. Ji Q; Zhao Y; Liu H; Yang Y; Wang Y; Ding W; Xia L; Wei L; Wang C Int Heart J; 2020 Mar; 61(2):201-208. PubMed ID: 32173697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]