170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30219865)
1. Quantitative assessment of DNA damage in the industrial ethanol production strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2.
Silva PC; Domingues L; Collins T; Oliveira R; Johansson B
FEMS Yeast Res; 2018 Dec; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 30219865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of genetic background of engineered xylose-fermenting industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates.
Lopes DD; Rosa CA; Hector RE; Dien BS; Mertens JA; Ayub MAZ
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 44(11):1575-1588. PubMed ID: 28891041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Co-expression of TAL1 and ADH1 in recombinant xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates in the presence of furfural.
Hasunuma T; Ismail KSK; Nambu Y; Kondo A
J Biosci Bioeng; 2014 Feb; 117(2):165-169. PubMed ID: 23916856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.
Jansen MLA; Bracher JM; Papapetridis I; Verhoeven MD; de Bruijn H; de Waal PP; van Maris AJA; Klaassen P; Pronk JT
FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Aug; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 28899031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Industrial robust yeast isolates with great potential for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass.
Pereira FB; Romaní A; Ruiz HA; Teixeira JA; Domingues L
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jun; 161():192-9. PubMed ID: 24704884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction of furan derivatives by overexpressing NADH-dependent Adh1 improves ethanol fermentation using xylose as sole carbon source with Saccharomyces cerevisiae harboring XR-XDH pathway.
Ishii J; Yoshimura K; Hasunuma T; Kondo A
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Mar; 97(6):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23001007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of PRS3, RPB4 and ZWF1 to the resistance of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCUG53310 and PE-2 strains to lignocellulosic hydrolysate-derived inhibitors.
Cunha JT; Aguiar TQ; Romaní A; Oliveira C; Domingues L
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():7-16. PubMed ID: 25974617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of robustness and ethanol production of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae under co-stress of heat and inhibitors.
Lu Y; Cheng YF; He XP; Guo XN; Zhang BR
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Jan; 39(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 21698486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deletion of the PHO13 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetic and formic acids, and furfural.
Fujitomi K; Sanda T; Hasunuma T; Kondo A
Bioresour Technol; 2012 May; 111():161-6. PubMed ID: 22357292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overexpression of the yeast transcription activator Msn2 confers furfural resistance and increases the initial fermentation rate in ethanol production.
Sasano Y; Watanabe D; Ukibe K; Inai T; Ohtsu I; Shimoi H; Takagi H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2012 Apr; 113(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 22178024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required to foster tolerance towards industrial wheat straw hydrolysates.
Pereira FB; Teixeira MC; Mira NP; Sá-Correia I; Domingues L
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Dec; 41(12):1753-61. PubMed ID: 25287021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of SHF and SSF processes from steam-exploded wheat straw for ethanol production by xylose-fermenting and robust glucose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Tomás-Pejó E; Oliva JM; Ballesteros M; Olsson L
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Aug; 100(6):1122-31. PubMed ID: 18383076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain.
Heer D; Sauer U
Microb Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 1(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 21261870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential effects of major inhibitory compounds from sugarcane-based lignocellulosic hydrolysates on the physiology of yeast strains and lactic acid bacteria.
Cola P; Procópio DP; Alves ATC; Carnevalli LR; Sampaio IV; da Costa BLV; Basso TO
Biotechnol Lett; 2020 Apr; 42(4):571-582. PubMed ID: 31974646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcriptional profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae T2 cells upon exposure to hardwood spent sulphite liquor: comparison to acetic acid, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural.
Bajwa PK; Ho CY; Chan CK; Martin VJ; Trevors JT; Lee H
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2013 Jun; 103(6):1281-95. PubMed ID: 23539198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plasmid-mediate transfer of FLO1 into industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2 strain creates a strain useful for repeat-batch fermentations involving flocculation-sedimentation.
Gomes DG; Guimarães PM; Pereira FB; Teixeira JA; Domingues L
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Mar; 108():162-8. PubMed ID: 22285899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Engineering the robustness of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by introducing bifunctional glutathione synthase gene.
Qiu Z; Deng Z; Tan H; Zhou S; Cao L
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Apr; 42(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 25561319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds.
Keating JD; Panganiban C; Mansfield SD
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Apr; 93(6):1196-206. PubMed ID: 16470880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strain construction for ethanol production from dilute-acid lignocellulosic hydrolysate.
Yan F; Bai F; Tian S; Zhang J; Zhang Z; Yang X
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2009 Jun; 157(3):473-82. PubMed ID: 18751961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to lignocellulose hydrolysate.
Modig T; Almeida JR; Gorwa-Grauslund MF; Lidén G
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Jun; 100(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 18438882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
