186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30220049)
1. Receptor pharmacophore ensemble (REPHARMBLE): a probabilistic pharmacophore modeling approach using multiple protein-ligand complexes.
Kumar SP
J Mol Model; 2018 Sep; 24(10):282. PubMed ID: 30220049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integration of the Butina algorithm and ensemble learning strategies for the advancement of a pharmacophore ligand-based model: an
Tran XD; Phan TL; To VT; Tran NN; Nguyen NS; Nguyen DH; Tran NN; Truong TN
Front Chem; 2024; 12():1382319. PubMed ID: 38690013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. BgN-Score and BsN-Score: bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 25734685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PharmRF: A machine-learning scoring function to identify the best protein-ligand complexes for structure-based pharmacophore screening with high enrichments.
Kumar SP; Dixit NY; Patel CN; Rawal RM; Pandya HA
J Comput Chem; 2022 May; 43(12):847-863. PubMed ID: 35301752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-level structure-based pharmacophore modelling of caspase-3-non-peptide complexes: Extracting essential pharmacophore features and its application to virtual screening.
Kumar SP; Jha PC
Chem Biol Interact; 2016 Jul; 254():207-20. PubMed ID: 27291469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Molecular Dynamics-Shared Pharmacophore Approach to Boost Early-Enrichment Virtual Screening: A Case Study on Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α.
Perricone U; Wieder M; Seidel T; Langer T; Padova A; Almerico AM; Tutone M
ChemMedChem; 2017 Aug; 12(16):1399-1407. PubMed ID: 28135036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ProPose: steered virtual screening by simultaneous protein-ligand docking and ligand-ligand alignment.
Seifert MH
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 15807511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ligand and structure-based approaches for the identification of SIRT1 activators.
Vyas VK; Goel A; Ghate M; Patel P
Chem Biol Interact; 2015 Feb; 228():9-17. PubMed ID: 25595223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Common Hits Approach: Combining Pharmacophore Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Wieder M; Garon A; Perricone U; Boresch S; Seidel T; Almerico AM; Langer T
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):365-385. PubMed ID: 28072524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Probabilistic Approach for Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Pharmacophores.
Madzhidov TI; Rakhimbekova A; Kutlushuna A; Polishchuk P
Molecules; 2020 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 31963467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel approach for efficient pharmacophore-based virtual screening: method and applications.
Dror O; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Inbar Y; Nussinov R; Wolfson HJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2333-43. PubMed ID: 19803502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pseudo-ligand approach to virtual screening.
Schüller A; Fechner U; Renner S; Franke L; Weber L; Schneider G
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2006 Jun; 9(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16787149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the stability of pharmacophore features using molecular dynamics simulations.
Wieder M; Perricone U; Boresch S; Seidel T; Langer T
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Feb; 470(3):685-689. PubMed ID: 26785387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of pharmacophore screening tools.
Sanders MP; Barbosa AJ; Zarzycka B; Nicolaes GA; Klomp JP; de Vlieg J; Del Rio A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1607-20. PubMed ID: 22646988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pharmacophore Models Derived From Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Protein-Ligand Complexes: A Case Study.
Wieder M; Perricone U; Seidel T; Langer T
Nat Prod Commun; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1499-1504. PubMed ID: 30549607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) assisted pharmacophore modeling.
Yu W; Lakkaraju SK; Raman EP; MacKerell AD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 May; 28(5):491-507. PubMed ID: 24610239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational screening, ensemble docking and pharmacophore analysis of potential gefitinib analogues against epidermal growth factor receptor.
Bommu UD; Konidala KK; Pamanji R; Yeguvapalli S
J Recept Signal Transduct Res; 2018 Feb; 38(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 29369008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
