These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30220505)

  • 1. Effect of loading frequency on cyclic fatigue lifetime of a standard-diameter implant with an internal abutment connection.
    Duan Y; Griggs JA
    Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1711-1716. PubMed ID: 30220505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
    Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue lifetime prediction of a reduced-diameter dental implant system: Numerical and experimental study.
    Duan Y; Gonzalez JA; Kulkarni PA; Nagy WW; Griggs JA
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1299-1309. PubMed ID: 29921465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load to failure of different titanium abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
    Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 26050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
    Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longevity of different abutments placed on narrow diameter implants: Assessment of structural damage and loosening.
    Lenz U; Santos RB; Griggs JA; Estrela C; Bueno MDR; Porto OCL; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2024 Sep; 40(9):1332-1340. PubMed ID: 38876825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
    Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Original vs compatible stock abutment- implant connection: An in vitro analysis of the internal accuracy and mechanical fatigue behaviour.
    Alonso-Pérez R; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
    J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Jul; 66(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 34866067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading.
    Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of fatigue loading on the screw joint stability of zirconium abutment.
    Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Kano T; Sasaki K
    J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Jul; 57(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 23796911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants.
    Park JM; Baek CH; Heo SJ; Kim SK; Koak JY; Kim SK; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 28291853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of reliability of CAD-CAM tooth-colored implant custom abutments.
    Guilherme NM; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Zheng C; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 26948082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.