BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30220600)

  • 1. Preserving replication fork integrity and competence via the homologous recombination pathway.
    Ait Saada A; Lambert SAE; Carr AM
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Nov; 71():135-147. PubMed ID: 30220600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication.
    Alexander JL; Orr-Weaver TL
    Genes Dev; 2016 Oct; 30(20):2241-2252. PubMed ID: 27898391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The multifaceted functions of homologous recombination in dealing with replication-associated DNA damages.
    Chakraborty S; Schirmeisen K; Lambert SA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2023 Sep; 129():103548. PubMed ID: 37541027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building up and breaking down: mechanisms controlling recombination during replication.
    Branzei D; Szakal B
    Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2017 Aug; 52(4):381-394. PubMed ID: 28325102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulation of replication fork speed: Mechanisms and impact on genomic stability.
    Merchut-Maya JM; Bartek J; Maya-Mendoza A
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Sep; 81():102654. PubMed ID: 31320249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replication Fork Reversal: Players and Guardians.
    Quinet A; Lemaçon D; Vindigni A
    Mol Cell; 2017 Dec; 68(5):830-833. PubMed ID: 29220651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DNA damage tolerance by recombination: Molecular pathways and DNA structures.
    Branzei D; Szakal B
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2016 Aug; 44():68-75. PubMed ID: 27236213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
    Tourrière H; Pasero P
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Replication stress-induced genome instability: the dark side of replication maintenance by homologous recombination.
    Carr AM; Lambert S
    J Mol Biol; 2013 Nov; 425(23):4733-44. PubMed ID: 23643490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slow Replication Fork Velocity of Homologous Recombination-Defective Cells Results from Endogenous Oxidative Stress.
    Wilhelm T; Ragu S; Magdalou I; Machon C; Dardillac E; Técher H; Guitton J; Debatisse M; Lopez BS
    PLoS Genet; 2016 May; 12(5):e1006007. PubMed ID: 27135742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of recombination and replication fork restart in repeat instability.
    Polleys EJ; House NCM; Freudenreich CH
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2017 Aug; 56():156-165. PubMed ID: 28641941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proteolytic control of genome integrity at the replication fork.
    Rageul J; Weinheimer AS; Park JJ; Kim H
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Sep; 81():102657. PubMed ID: 31324531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.
    Patel DR; Weiss RS
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Dec; 46(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 30514768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.
    Kondratick CM; Washington MT; Spies M
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2021 May; 113():27-37. PubMed ID: 33967572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
    Vázquez MV; Rojas V; Tercero JA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
    Lambert S; Carr AM
    Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.
    Joseph SA; Taglialatela A; Leuzzi G; Huang JW; Cuella-Martin R; Ciccia A
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2020 Nov; 95():102943. PubMed ID: 32971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA double-strand breaks associated with replication forks are predominantly repaired by homologous recombination involving an exchange mechanism in mammalian cells.
    Arnaudeau C; Lundin C; Helleday T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 307(5):1235-45. PubMed ID: 11292338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
    Jones RM; Petermann E
    Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mms22 preserves genomic integrity during DNA replication in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
    Dovey CL; Russell P
    Genetics; 2007 Sep; 177(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 17660542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.