These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30220749)

  • 1. Validation of a closing procedure for fourth-order RANS turbulence models with DNS data in an incompressible zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer.
    Poroseva SV; Kaiser BE; Sillero JA; Murman SM
    Int J Heat Fluid Flow; 2015 Dec; 56():71-79. PubMed ID: 30220749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the accuracy of RANS simulations with DNS data.
    Poroseva SV; Colmenares F JD; Murman SM
    Phys Fluids (1994); 2016 Nov; 28(11):. PubMed ID: 30271109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Turbulent transport and mixing in transitional Rayleigh-Taylor unstable flow: A priori assessment of gradient-diffusion and similarity modeling.
    Schilling O; Mueschke NJ
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Dec; 96(6-1):063111. PubMed ID: 29347290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-scaling analysis of turbulent boundary layers over an isothermally heated flat plate with zero pressure gradient.
    Shuvo MS; Mahmud MJ; Saha S
    Heliyon; 2023 Dec; 9(12):e22721. PubMed ID: 38089999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of symmetry-induced high moment velocity and temperature scaling laws in a turbulent channel flow.
    Alcántara-Ávila F; García-Raffi LM; Hoyas S; Oberlack M
    Phys Rev E; 2024 Feb; 109(2-2):025104. PubMed ID: 38491667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison and verification of turbulence Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes closures to model spatially varied flows.
    Chipongo K; Khiadani M; Sookhak Lari K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19059. PubMed ID: 33149223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CFD simulation of pollutant dispersion around isolated buildings: on the role of convective and turbulent mass fluxes in the prediction accuracy.
    Gousseau P; Blocken B; van Heijst GJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Oct; 194():422-34. PubMed ID: 21880420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical study of turbulent separation bubbles with varying pressure gradient and Reynolds number.
    Coleman GN; Rumsey CL; Spalart PR
    J Fluid Mech; 2018 May; 847():28-70. PubMed ID: 31831915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Turbulence Modeling of Blood Flow in a Stenotic Vessel.
    Lui M; Martino S; Salerno M; Quadrio M
    J Biomech Eng; 2020 Jan; 142(1):. PubMed ID: 31201739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of turbulence modelling on the assessment of platelet activation.
    Bozzi S; Dominissini D; Redaelli A; Passoni G
    J Biomech; 2021 Nov; 128():110704. PubMed ID: 34482226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-fidelity modelling of shark skin denticle flows: insights into drag generation mechanisms.
    Lloyd CJ; Mittal K; Dutta S; Dorrell RM; Peakall J; Keevil GM; Burns AD
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):220684. PubMed ID: 36756066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling boundary-layer transition in direct and large-eddy simulations using parabolized stability equations.
    Lozano-Durán A; Hack MJP; Moin P
    Phys Rev Fluids; 2018 Feb; 3(2):. PubMed ID: 31633077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compressible turbulent plane channel DNS datasets.
    Gerolymos GA; Vallet I
    Data Brief; 2024 Aug; 55():110737. PubMed ID: 39175794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of LES of steady transitional flow in an idealized stenosed axisymmetric artery model with a RANS transitional model.
    Tan FP; Wood NB; Tabor G; Xu XY
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 May; 133(5):051001. PubMed ID: 21599092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit Subgrid-Scale Modeling of a Mach 2.5 Spatially Developing Turbulent Boundary Layer.
    Araya G; Lagares C
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Apr; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 35455218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear eddy viscosity modeling and experimental study of jet spreading rates.
    Heschl C; Inthavong K; Sanz W; Tu J
    Indoor Air; 2014 Feb; 24(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 23668473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic slip wall model for large-eddy simulation.
    Bae HJ; Lozano-Durán A; Bose ST; Moin P
    J Fluid Mech; 2019 Jan; 859():400-432. PubMed ID: 31631905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using parabolized stability equations to model boundary-layer transition in direct and large-eddy simulations.
    Lozano-Durán A; Hack MJP; Moin P
    48th AIAA Fluid Dyn Conf 2018 (2018); 2018 Jun; 2018():. PubMed ID: 33123700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large Eddy Simulation and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes modeling of flow in a realistic pharyngeal airway model: an investigation of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Mihaescu M; Murugappan S; Kalra M; Khosla S; Gutmark E
    J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2279-88. PubMed ID: 18514205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative predictions of turbulent non-isothermal flow of a viscoplastic fluid with yield stress.
    Pakhomov MA; Zhapbasbayev UK
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24062. PubMed ID: 38293371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.