186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30220912)
1. Machine learning analysis of microbial flow cytometry data from nanoparticles, antibiotics and carbon sources perturbed anaerobic microbiomes.
Dhoble AS; Lahiri P; Bhalerao KD
J Biol Eng; 2018; 12():19. PubMed ID: 30220912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel high-throughput multi-parameter flow cytometry based method for monitoring and rapid characterization of microbiome dynamics in anaerobic systems.
Dhoble AS; Bekal S; Dolatowski W; Yanz C; Lambert KN; Bhalerao KD
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 220():566-571. PubMed ID: 27614579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep convolutional neural network and IoT technology for healthcare.
Wassan S; Dongyan H; Suhail B; Jhanjhi NZ; Xiao G; Ahmed S; Murugesan RK
Digit Health; 2024; 10():20552076231220123. PubMed ID: 38250147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triangulation of microbial fingerprinting in anaerobic digestion reveals consistent fingerprinting profiles.
De Vrieze J; Heyer R; Props R; Van Meulebroek L; Gille K; Vanhaecke L; Benndorf D; Boon N
Water Res; 2021 Sep; 202():117422. PubMed ID: 34280807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metagenomic approaches: effective tools for monitoring the structure and functionality of microbiomes in anaerobic digestion systems.
Carabeo-Pérez A; Guerra-Rivera G; Ramos-Leal M; Jiménez-Hernández J
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Dec; 103(23-24):9379-9390. PubMed ID: 31420693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of machine learning algorithms for taxonomic classification of marine metagenomes.
Park H; Lim SJ; Cosme J; O'Connell K; Sandeep J; Gayanilo F; Cutter GR; Montes E; Nitikitpaiboon C; Fisher S; Moustahfid H; Thompson LR
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Sep; 11(5):e0523722. PubMed ID: 37695074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of flow cytometry for rapid, high-throughput, multiparametric analysis of environmental microbiomes.
Priyadarsini M; Kushwaha J; Pandey KP; Rani J; Dhoble AS
J Microbiol Methods; 2023 Nov; 214():106841. PubMed ID: 37832922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning applications in microbial ecology, human microbiome studies, and environmental monitoring.
Ghannam RB; Techtmann SM
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():1092-1107. PubMed ID: 33680353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ecological Stability Properties of Microbial Communities Assessed by Flow Cytometry.
Liu Z; Cichocki N; Bonk F; Günther S; Schattenberg F; Harms H; Centler F; Müller S
mSphere; 2018; 3(1):. PubMed ID: 29359193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operation-driven heterogeneity and overlooked feed-associated populations in global anaerobic digester microbiome.
Mei R; Nobu MK; Narihiro T; Kuroda K; Muñoz Sierra J; Wu Z; Ye L; Lee PKH; Lee PH; van Lier JB; McInerney MJ; Kamagata Y; Liu WT
Water Res; 2017 Nov; 124():77-84. PubMed ID: 28750287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PhenoGMM: Gaussian Mixture Modeling of Cytometry Data Quantifies Changes in Microbial Community Structure.
Rubbens P; Props R; Kerckhof FM; Boon N; Waegeman W
mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33536320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elucidating Syntrophic Butyrate-Degrading Populations in Anaerobic Digesters Using Stable-Isotope-Informed Genome-Resolved Metagenomics.
Ziels RM; Nobu MK; Sousa DZ
mSystems; 2019 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31387934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Host-microbial systems as glass cannons: Explaining microbiome stability in corals exposed to extrinsic perturbations.
Dunphy CM; Vollmer SV; Gouhier TC
J Anim Ecol; 2021 May; 90(5):1044-1057. PubMed ID: 33666231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbial indicators of environmental perturbations in coral reef ecosystems.
Glasl B; Bourne DG; Frade PR; Thomas T; Schaffelke B; Webster NS
Microbiome; 2019 Jun; 7(1):94. PubMed ID: 31227022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting the Presence and Abundance of Bacterial Taxa in Environmental Communities through Flow Cytometric Fingerprinting.
Heyse J; Schattenberg F; Rubbens P; Müller S; Waegeman W; Boon N; Props R
mSystems; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0055121. PubMed ID: 34546074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metagenomic analysis and functional characterization of the biogas microbiome using high throughput shotgun sequencing and a novel binning strategy.
Campanaro S; Treu L; Kougias PG; De Francisci D; Valle G; Angelidaki I
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2016; 9():26. PubMed ID: 26839589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Syntrophic Acetate-Oxidizing Microbial Consortia Enriched from Full-Scale Mesophilic Food Waste Anaerobic Digesters Showing High Biodiversity and Functional Redundancy.
Li C; Hao L; Lü F; Duan H; Zhang H; He P
mSystems; 2022 Oct; 7(5):e0033922. PubMed ID: 36073802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personalized microbiome dynamics - Cytometric fingerprints for routine diagnostics.
Koch C; Müller S
Mol Aspects Med; 2018 Feb; 59():123-134. PubMed ID: 28669592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Redundancy in Anaerobic Digestion Microbiomes during Disturbances by the Antibiotic Monensin.
Spirito CM; Daly SE; Werner JJ; Angenent LT
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 May; 84(9):. PubMed ID: 29500266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proteotyping of biogas plant microbiomes separates biogas plants according to process temperature and reactor type.
Heyer R; Benndorf D; Kohrs F; De Vrieze J; Boon N; Hoffmann M; Rapp E; Schlüter A; Sczyrba A; Reichl U
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2016; 9():155. PubMed ID: 27462366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
