These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30221016)

  • 1. On the use of kernel machines for Mendelian randomization.
    Zhang W; Ghosh D
    Quant Biol; 2017 Dec; 5(4):368-379. PubMed ID: 30221016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
    Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general approach to sensitivity analysis for Mendelian randomization.
    Zhang W; Ghosh D
    Stat Biosci; 2021 Apr; 13(1):34-55. PubMed ID: 33737984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias and mean squared error in Mendelian randomization with invalid instrumental variables.
    Deng L; Fu S; Yu K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 48(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 37970963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mendelian Randomization With Refined Instrumental Variables From Genetic Score Improves Accuracy and Reduces Bias.
    Lin L; Zhang R; Huang H; Zhu Y; Li Y; Dong X; Shen S; Wei L; Chen X; Christiani DC; Wei Y; Chen F
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():618829. PubMed ID: 33868364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approximation of bias and mean-squared error in two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses.
    Deng L; Zhang H; Song L; Yu K
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 31651042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.
    Burgess S; Daniel RM; Butterworth AS; Thompson SG;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 25150977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mendelian randomization with incomplete measurements on the exposure in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.
    Li Y; Wong KY; Howard AG; Gordon-Larsen P; Highland HM; Graff M; North KE; Downie CG; Avery CL; Yu B; Young KL; Buchanan VL; Kaplan R; Hou L; Joyce BT; Qi Q; Sofer T; Moon JY; Lin DY
    HGG Adv; 2024 Jan; 5(1):100245. PubMed ID: 37817410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Valid instrumental variable selection method using negative control outcomes and constructing efficient estimator.
    Orihara S; Goto A; Taguri M
    Biom J; 2024 Jun; 66(4):e2300113. PubMed ID: 38801216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using instrumental variables to estimate the attributable fraction.
    Dahlqwist E; Kutalik Z; Sjölander A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2063-2073. PubMed ID: 31640504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal Genetic Inference Using Haplotypes as Instrumental Variables.
    Wang F; Meyer NJ; Walley KR; Russell JA; Feng R
    Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 40(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 26625855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
    Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators.
    Pierce BL; Burgess S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 178(7):1177-84. PubMed ID: 23863760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?
    Ogbuanu IU; Zhang H; Karmaus W
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2009 May; 6():3. PubMed ID: 19432981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-stage multivariate Mendelian randomization on multiple outcomes with mixed distributions.
    Deng Y; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Liu G; Xu W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1543-1558. PubMed ID: 37338962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology.
    Lee K; Lim CY
    J Lipid Atheroscler; 2019 Sep; 8(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 32821701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity.
    Dick K; Schneider JE; Briggs A; Lecomte P; Regnier SA; Lean M
    Health Econ Rev; 2021 May; 11(1):16. PubMed ID: 33990897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overlapping-sample Mendelian randomisation with multiple exposures: a Bayesian approach.
    Zou L; Guo H; Berzuini C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 33287714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.