These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30221408)

  • 1. Observations below multiple lower limits of quantification: How to estimate the mean and variance.
    Berger T; Hilgers RD; Heussen N
    Biom J; 2019 Sep; 61(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 30221408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data.
    Bülow T; Hilgers RD; Heussen N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293640. PubMed ID: 37917602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
    Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling observations with a detection limit using a truncated normal distribution with censoring.
    Williams JR; Kim HW; Crespi CM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):170. PubMed ID: 32600261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
    Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
    Newton E; Rudel R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Methods for Generalized Linear Models with Covariates Subject to Detection Limits.
    Bernhardt PW; Wang HJ; Zhang D
    Stat Biosci; 2015 May; 7(1):68-89. PubMed ID: 26257836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequentist and Bayesian tolerance intervals for setting specification limits for left-censored gamma distributed drug quality attributes.
    Montes RO
    Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(2):168-184. PubMed ID: 37871968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
    Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
    Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data.
    Wei GC; Tanner MA
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1297-309. PubMed ID: 1786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
    Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
    Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cox regression model with randomly censored covariates.
    Atem FD; Matsouaka RA; Zimmern VE
    Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):1020-1032. PubMed ID: 30908720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating survival curves with left-truncated and interval-censored data under monotone hazards.
    Pan W; Chappell R
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1053-60. PubMed ID: 9750251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.