BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30221408)

  • 1. Observations below multiple lower limits of quantification: How to estimate the mean and variance.
    Berger T; Hilgers RD; Heussen N
    Biom J; 2019 Sep; 61(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 30221408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data.
    Bülow T; Hilgers RD; Heussen N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293640. PubMed ID: 37917602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
    Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling observations with a detection limit using a truncated normal distribution with censoring.
    Williams JR; Kim HW; Crespi CM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):170. PubMed ID: 32600261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
    Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
    Newton E; Rudel R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Methods for Generalized Linear Models with Covariates Subject to Detection Limits.
    Bernhardt PW; Wang HJ; Zhang D
    Stat Biosci; 2015 May; 7(1):68-89. PubMed ID: 26257836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequentist and Bayesian tolerance intervals for setting specification limits for left-censored gamma distributed drug quality attributes.
    Montes RO
    Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(2):168-184. PubMed ID: 37871968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
    Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
    Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data.
    Wei GC; Tanner MA
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1297-309. PubMed ID: 1786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
    Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
    Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cox regression model with randomly censored covariates.
    Atem FD; Matsouaka RA; Zimmern VE
    Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):1020-1032. PubMed ID: 30908720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating survival curves with left-truncated and interval-censored data under monotone hazards.
    Pan W; Chappell R
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1053-60. PubMed ID: 9750251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.