These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30221542)

  • 21. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with x-ray diffraction.
    Hidas G; Eliahou R; Duvdevani M; Coulon P; Lemaitre L; Gofrit ON; Pode D; Sosna J
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 20807846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Low-dose and standard computed tomography scans yield equivalent stone measurements.
    Sohn W; Clayman RV; Lee JY; Cohen A; Mucksavage P
    Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 23374764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Proof of principle in vitro study of a prototype ultrasound technology to size stone fragments during ureteroscopy.
    Sorensen MD; Teichman JM; Bailey MR
    J Endourol; 2009 Jul; 23(7):1161-4. PubMed ID: 19538061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coronal imaging to assess urinary tract stone size.
    Nadler RB; Stern JA; Kimm S; Hoff F; Rademaker AW
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):962-4. PubMed ID: 15311009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.
    Narepalem N; Sundaram CP; Boridy IC; Yan Y; Heiken JP; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11832704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy; sensitivities of different imaging methods in renal stone detection.
    Lehtoranta K; Mankinen P; Taari K; Rannikko S; Lehtonen T; Salo J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1995; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7645910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in computed tomography density of the renal papillae of stone formers and non-stone-formers: a pilot study.
    Eisner BH; Iqbal A; Namasivayam S; Catalano O; Kambadakone A; Dretler SP; Sahani DV
    J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2207-10. PubMed ID: 18831676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro sonographic evaluation of common bile duct stones and fragments with a high-frequency microprobe.
    Yamagata M; Kawabe T; Toda N; Ohashi M; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Shiratori Y; Omata M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1999 Jun; 27(5):249-57. PubMed ID: 10355888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity of Noncontrast Computed Tomography for Small Renal Calculi With Endoscopy as the Gold Standard.
    Bhojani N; Paonessa JE; El Tayeb MM; Williams JC; Hameed TA; Lingeman JE
    Urology; 2018 Jul; 117():36-40. PubMed ID: 29625137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The reliability of color doppler "twinkling" artifact for diagnosing millimetrical nephrolithiasis: comparison with B-Mode US and CT scanning results.
    Yavuz A; Ceken K; Alimoglu E; Kabaalioglu A
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2015 Apr; 42(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 26576575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ultrasonography Significantly Overestimates Stone Size When Compared to Low-dose, Noncontrast Computed Tomography.
    Sternberg KM; Eisner B; Larson T; Hernandez N; Han J; Pais VM
    Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():67-71. PubMed ID: 27289025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Amplitude, isobar and grey-scale imaging of ultrasonic shadows behind rigid, elastic and gaseous spheres.
    Filipczyński L; Kujawska T; Tymkiewicz R; Wójcik J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 8735535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study.
    Eisner BH; Kambadakone A; Monga M; Anderson JK; Thoreson AA; Lee H; Dretler SP; Sahani DV
    J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1710-5. PubMed ID: 19230922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Motion artifacts in kidney stone imaging using single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT scanners: a phantom study.
    Ibrahim el-SH; Cernigliaro JG; Pooley RA; Williams JC; Haley WE
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3161-7. PubMed ID: 26318750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic and mechanical properties of artificial stones in comparison to natural kidney stones.
    Heimbach D; Munver R; Zhong P; Jacobs J; Hesse A; Müller SC; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):537-44. PubMed ID: 10893640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stone size limits the use of Hounsfield units for prediction of calcium oxalate stone composition.
    Stewart G; Johnson L; Ganesh H; Davenport D; Smelser W; Crispen P; Venkatesh R
    Urology; 2015 Feb; 85(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 25481232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A composite kidney stone phantom with mechanical properties controllable over the range of human kidney stones.
    Simmons WN; Cocks FH; Zhong P; Preminger G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Jan; 3(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 19878912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: comparison with CT.
    Ulusan S; Koc Z; Tokmak N
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 Jun; 35(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 17373690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-Dimensional Texture Analysis with Machine Learning Provides Incremental Predictive Information for Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Kidney Stones.
    Mannil M; von Spiczak J; Hermanns T; Poyet C; Alkadhi H; Fankhauser CD
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):829-836. PubMed ID: 29673945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.