These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30221584)

  • 1. Multi-target visual search organisation across the lifespan: cancellation task performance in a large and demographically stratified sample of healthy adults.
    Benjamins JS; Dalmaijer ES; Ten Brink AF; Nijboer TCW; Van der Stigchel S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2019 Sep; 26(5):731-748. PubMed ID: 30221584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging effects on extrapersonal (far-space) attention: cancellation and line bisection performance from 179 healthy adults.
    Morse H; Jolly AA; Browning H; Clark A; Pomeroy V; Rossit S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2024 Jul; 31(4):605-626. PubMed ID: 37314105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introspection during visual search.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():212-29. PubMed ID: 25286130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Just thinking about targets can aggravate neglect on cancellation tests.
    Mennemeier MS; Morris M; Heilman KM
    Neurocase; 2004 Feb; 10(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 15849157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Target-to-distractor ratio effects on decision time in the orderly array shape cancellation task.
    Nakajima Y; Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Oct; 113(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 24597434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention-related modulation of frontal midline theta oscillations in cingulate cortex during a spatial cueing Go/NoGo task.
    Hong X; Sun J; Wang J; Li C; Tong S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Feb; 148():1-12. PubMed ID: 31857191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks.
    Di Luca S; Pesenti M; Vallar G; Girelli L
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 225(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 23307158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The guidance of visual search by shape features and shape configurations.
    McCants CW; Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1072-1085. PubMed ID: 29494192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.
    Levin DT; Biswas G; Lappin JS; Rushdy M; Seiffert AE
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Sep; 74():102781. PubMed ID: 31319238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition in time-based visual selection: Strategic or by default?
    Zupan Z; Watson DG; Blagrove E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1442-61. PubMed ID: 26168141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition of irrelevant response codes is affected by matching target-distractor modalities.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 30589356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative analysis of cancellation tasks in neglect.
    Chatterjee A; Thompson KA; Ricci R
    Cortex; 1999 Apr; 35(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 10369097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of paired-object affordance in search tasks across the adult lifespan.
    Wulff M; Stainton A; Rotshtein P
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():22-33. PubMed ID: 27045450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of cognitive load on spatial search performance.
    Longstaffe KA; Hood BM; Gilchrist ID
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 24170380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional flexibility is imbalanced: Asymmetric cost for switches between external and internal attention.
    Verschooren S; Liefooghe B; Brass M; Pourtois G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1399-1414. PubMed ID: 31343243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How many forms of perseveration? Evidence from cancellation tasks in right hemisphere patients.
    Gandola M; Toraldo A; Invernizzi P; Corrado L; Sberna M; Santilli I; Bottini G; Paulesu E
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Dec; 51(14):2960-75. PubMed ID: 24200919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.