212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30221609)
1. Application of a fluorescent marker with quantitative bioburden methods to assess cleanliness.
Hung IC; Chang HY; Cheng A; Chen AC; Ting L; Chen MW; Lai YH; Sheng WH
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1296-1300. PubMed ID: 30221609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices.
Boyce JM; Havill NL; Havill HL; Mangione E; Dumigan DG; Moore BA
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 32(12):1187-93. PubMed ID: 22080657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay.
Boyce JM; Havill NL; Dumigan DG; Golebiewski M; Balogun O; Rizvani R
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 30(7):678-84. PubMed ID: 19489715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing visual inspection, aerobic colony counts, and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for evaluating surface cleanliness at a medical center.
Huang YS; Chen YC; Chen ML; Cheng A; Hung IC; Wang JT; Sheng WH; Chang SC
Am J Infect Control; 2015 Aug; 43(8):882-6. PubMed ID: 25952617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of environmental cleaning of patient rooms: Impact of different fluorescent gel markers.
Rock C; Xie A; Andonian J; Hsu YJ; Osei P; Keller SC; Gurses AP; Trexler P; Maragakis LL; Cosgrove SE;
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):100-102. PubMed ID: 30419977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic assessment of different environmental cleaning monitoring methods.
Luick L; Thompson PA; Loock MH; Vetter SL; Cook J; Guerrero DM
Am J Infect Control; 2013 Aug; 41(8):751-2. PubMed ID: 23380380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations in hospital daily cleaning practices.
Boyce JM; Havill NL; Lipka A; Havill H; Rizvani R
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 19951203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visualization of hospital cleanliness in three Japanese hospitals with a tendency toward long-term care.
Watanabe R; Shimoda T; Yano R; Hayashi Y; Nakamura S; Matsuo J; Yamaguchi H
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Mar; 7():121. PubMed ID: 24593868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The adenosine triphosphate method as a quality control tool to assess 'cleanliness' of frequently touched hospital surfaces.
Knape L; Hambraeus A; Lytsy B
J Hosp Infect; 2015 Oct; 91(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 26213368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of adenosine triphosphate detection and feedback on hospital room cleaning.
Smith PW; Beam E; Sayles H; Rupp ME; Cavalieri RJ; Gibbs S; Hewlett A
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2014 May; 35(5):564-9. PubMed ID: 24709726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ATP bioluminescence assay for evaluating cleaning practices in operating theatres: applicability and limitations.
Sanna T; Dallolio L; Raggi A; Mazzetti M; Lorusso G; Zanni A; Farruggia P; Leoni E
BMC Infect Dis; 2018 Nov; 18(1):583. PubMed ID: 30453892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the effectiveness of surface cleaning methods in intravitreal injection procedure rooms.
Amin SR; Folkert CM; Erie JC
Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):276-282. PubMed ID: 24112945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review.
Nante N; Ceriale E; Messina G; Lenzi D; Manzi P
J Prev Med Hyg; 2017 Jun; 58(2):E177-E183. PubMed ID: 28900359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monitoring the effectiveness of cleaning in four British hospitals.
Cooper RA; Griffith CJ; Malik RE; Obee P; Looker N
Am J Infect Control; 2007 Jun; 35(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 17577482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating accuracy of sampling strategies for fluorescent gel monitoring of patient room cleaning.
Rock C; Small BA; Hsu YJ; Gurses AP; Xie A; Scheeler V; Cummings S; Trexler P; Milstone AM; Maragakis LL; Cosgrove SE;
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 40(7):794-797. PubMed ID: 31172902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting.
Moore G; Smyth D; Singleton J; Wilson P
Am J Infect Control; 2010 Oct; 38(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 20605265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces.
Lewis T; Griffith C; Gallo M; Weinbren M
J Hosp Infect; 2008 Jun; 69(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 18468725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of a novel fluorescent marker and environmental surface cultures to assess the efficacy of environmental cleaning practices at a tertiary care hospital.
Dewangan A; Gaikwad U
J Hosp Infect; 2020 Mar; 104(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 31760128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it really clean? An evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness.
Sherlock O; O'Connell N; Creamer E; Humphreys H
J Hosp Infect; 2009 Jun; 72(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 19321226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing health care-associated infections by implementing separated environmental cleaning management measures by using disposable wipes of four colors.
Wong SS; Huang CH; Yang CC; Hsieh YP; Kuo CN; Chen YR; Chen LC
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2018; 7():34. PubMed ID: 29541446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
