These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
573 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30222598)
1. US FDA Breast Implant Postapproval Studies: Long-term Outcomes in 99,993 Patients. Coroneos CJ; Selber JC; Offodile AC; Butler CE; Clemens MW Ann Surg; 2019 Jan; 269(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30222598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience. Doren EL; Pierpont YN; Shivers SC; Berger LH Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):957-966. PubMed ID: 26505700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-Year Safety Data for More than 55,000 Subjects following Breast Implantation: Comparison of Rare Adverse Event Rates with Silicone Implants versus National Norms and Saline Implants. Singh N; Picha GJ; Hardas B; Schumacher A; Murphy DK Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Oct; 140(4):666-679. PubMed ID: 28953716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and Efficacy of the Sientra Silicone Gel Round and Shaped Breast Implants: 6-Year Results of the U.S. Postapproval Study. Calobrace MB; Schwartz MR; Kaufman DL; Gordon AE; Cohen R; Harrington J; Dajles D; Zeidler K Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jul; 154(1):44e-56e. PubMed ID: 37563756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. Maxwell GP; Van Natta BW; Murphy DK; Slicton A; Bengtson BP Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):709-17. PubMed ID: 22751081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eight-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel. Stevens WG; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Broadway D; Zeidler K; Godinez TB Aesthet Surg J; 2015 May; 35 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 25948657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants. Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel. Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; d'Incelli RC Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 26961987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year Core Study Data for Sientra's Food and Drug Administration-Approved Round and Shaped Breast Implants with Cohesive Silicone Gel. Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; Harrington JL; d'Incelli RC Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):7S-19S. PubMed ID: 29595714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Hammond DC; Migliori MM; Caplin DA; Garcia ME; Phillips CA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Jun; 129(6):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 22327894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mentor Contour Profile Gel Implants: Clinical Outcomes at 10 Years. Hammond DC; Canady JW; Love TR; Wixtrom RN; Caplin DA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1142-1150. PubMed ID: 29176413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients. Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indications for the use of MemoryShape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants. Caplin DA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Sep; 134(3 Suppl):27S-37S. PubMed ID: 25158767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk Factor Analysis for Capsular Contracture, Malposition, and Late Seroma in Subjects Receiving Natrelle 410 Form-Stable Silicone Breast Implants. McGuire P; Reisman NR; Murphy DK Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27627058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natrelle Silicone Breast Implant Follow-Up Study: Demographics, Lifestyle, and Surgical Characteristics of More Than 50,000 Augmentation Subjects. Singh N; Picha GJ; Murphy DK Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jan; 137(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 26710009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ideal Implant Structured Breast Implants: Core Study Results through 10 Years. Nichter LS; Hardesty RA; Zimmerman TJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Sep; 152(3):424e-432e. PubMed ID: 36827477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IDEAL IMPLANT Structured Breast Implants: Core Study Results at 6 Years. Nichter LS; Hardesty RA; Anigian GM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jul; 142(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 29489559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eight-Year Safety Data for Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants. Duteille F; Perrot P; Bacheley MH; Stewart S Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29040345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Cunningham B; McCue J Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 May; 33(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 19437068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-Year Intermediate Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study Investigating the use of Smooth, Semi-Smooth, Microtextured and Macrotextured Implants from a Single Manufacturer in Breast Augmentation and Reconstruction Procedures. Marchac A; El Haddad R; Boedec C; DE Greef C; Dubrulle F; Garcia Perez J; Rostane Renouard D; Sanchez Nebreda M; Morral S; Sanchez Lagarejo E; Moran Montepeque JL; Terezanov O; Fink V; DE Mortillet S; Gounot N; Bricout N J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Nov; 74(11):3150-3157. PubMed ID: 34088647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]