These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30222936)

  • 41. Validation of an OpenSim full-body model with detailed lumbar spine for estimating lower lumbar spine loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Robertson WSP; Brandon SCE; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):451-464. PubMed ID: 30714401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of initial horizontal weight placement on the loads at the lumbar spine while lifting.
    Schipplein OD; Reinsel TE; Andersson GB; Lavender SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(17):1895-8. PubMed ID: 8560338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of changes in the lumbar posture in lifting on trunk muscle and spinal loads: A combined in vivo, musculoskeletal, and finite element model study.
    Khoddam-Khorasani P; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 104():109728. PubMed ID: 32147242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lumbar-load analysis of manual patient-handling activities for biomechanical overload prevention among healthcare workers.
    Jäger M; Jordan C; Theilmeier A; Wortmann N; Kuhn S; Nienhaus A; Luttmann A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 May; 57(4):528-44. PubMed ID: 23253360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Validation of the AnyBody full body musculoskeletal model in computing lumbar spine loads at L4L5 level.
    Bassani T; Stucovitz E; Qian Z; Briguglio M; Galbusera F
    J Biomech; 2017 Jun; 58():89-96. PubMed ID: 28521951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of body weight on spinal loads in various activities: a personalized biomechanical modeling approach.
    Hajihosseinali M; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 25498363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Load by Computational Method in Order to Acknowledge Low-back Disorders as Occupational Diseases.
    Hlávková J; Lebeda T; Tichý T; Gaďourek P; Urban P; Nakládalová M; Laštovková A; Fenclová Z; Ridzoň P; Ehler E; Richter M; Pešáková L; Pelclová D
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2016 Mar; 24(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 27070971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of ground reaction forces and centers of pressure predicted by AnyBody Modeling System during load reaching/handling activities and effects of the prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads.
    Daroudi S; Arjmand N; Mohseni M; El-Rich M; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111974. PubMed ID: 38331648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
    Ranavolo A; Varrecchia T; Rinaldi M; Silvetti A; Serrao M; Conforto S; Draicchio F
    Ind Health; 2017 Oct; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Epidemiological and biomechanical evaluation of airline baggage handling.
    Tafazzol A; Aref S; Mardani M; Haddad O; Parnianpour M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 26654282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks performed in restricted workspaces.
    Elfeituri FE
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2001; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 11543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A Biomechanical Waist Comfort Model for Manual Material Lifting.
    Zhang Y; Ke J; Wu X; Luo X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32824371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Artificial neural networks to predict 3D spinal posture in reaching and lifting activities; Applications in biomechanical models.
    Gholipour A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2946-2952. PubMed ID: 27452877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering.
    Gagnon D; Gagnon M
    J Biomech; 1992 Aug; 25(8):891-901. PubMed ID: 1639833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Apportionment of lumbar L2-S1 rotation across individual motion segments during a dynamic lifting task.
    Aiyangar A; Zheng L; Anderst W; Zhang X
    J Biomech; 2015 Oct; 48(13):3709-15. PubMed ID: 26362687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting.
    Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Oct; 12(5):436-47. PubMed ID: 10549710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.