1284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30222939)
1. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association Between Body Mass Index, Uterine Size, and Operative Morbidity in Women Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
Shah DK; Van Voorhis BJ; Vitonis AF; Missmer SA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1113-1122. PubMed ID: 27523922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease.
Price JT; Zimmerman LD; Koelper NC; Sammel MD; Lee S; Butts SF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):572.e1-572.e10. PubMed ID: 28784416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of complications, conversion rate, malignancy rate, and, surgeon's experience in laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) of 1274 large uteri: A retrospective study.
Tchartchian G; Bojahr B; Krentel H; De Wilde RL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Dec; 101(12):1450-1457. PubMed ID: 36203317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk-prediction Model for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Pepin K; Cook F; Maghsoudlou P; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1751-1758.e1. PubMed ID: 33713836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.
Perutelli A; Domenici L; Garibaldi S; Albanesi G; Baroni C; Salvati L; Salvati N; Cecchi E; Bottone P; Salerno MG
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Feb; 26(4):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 35253179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complication rate of uterine morcellation in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
Smits RM; De Kruif JH; Van Heteren CF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():179-82. PubMed ID: 26943477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Venous Thromboembolism After Abdominal and Minimally Invasive Large Specimen Hysterectomy.
Pham NK; Jalloul RJ; Chen HY; Hui M; Leon MG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 30(11):884-889. PubMed ID: 37422052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.
Billfeldt NK; Borgfeldt C; Lindkvist H; Stjerndahl JH; Ankardal M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():113-118. PubMed ID: 29408741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Uteri Greater Than One Kilogram.
Ito TE; Vargas MV; Moawad GN; Opoku-Anane J; Shu MK; Marfori CQ; Robinson JK
JSLS; 2017; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 28352147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery.
Barber EL; Harris B; Gehrig PA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):215.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26884272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive myomectomy: practice trends and differences between Black and non-Black women within a large integrated healthcare system.
Zaritsky E; Le A; Tucker LY; Ojo A; Weintraub MR; Raine-Bennett T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 226(6):826.e1-826.e11. PubMed ID: 35101407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
