These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30223147)

  • 1. RETRACTED: Auditory (dis-)fluency triggers sequential processing adjustments.
    Dolk T; Freigang C; Bogon J; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():69-75. PubMed ID: 30223147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA; Craik FI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):735-51. PubMed ID: 17853231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. If it's hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments.
    Dreisbach G; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 21210144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Working Memory Enhance or Interfere With Speech Fluency in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter? Evidence From a Dual-Task Paradigm.
    Eichorn N; Marton K; Schwartz RG; Melara RD; Pirutinsky S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):415-29. PubMed ID: 27168125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study.
    Kronenberger WG; Henning SC; Ditmars AM; Pisoni DB
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Nov; 19(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 29976119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of language, spatial factors, masker type and memory span on speech-in-noise thresholds in sequential bilingual children.
    MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Fels J; Ljung R
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 59(6):567-577. PubMed ID: 30137681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory disruption by irrelevant noise-vocoded speech: Effects of native language and the number of frequency bands.
    Ellermeier W; Kattner F; Ueda K; Doumoto K; Nakajima Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1561-9. PubMed ID: 26428793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluency-dependent cortical activation associated with speech production and comprehension in second language learners.
    Shimada K; Hirotani M; Yokokawa H; Yoshida H; Makita K; Yamazaki-Murase M; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
    Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():474-92. PubMed ID: 26026679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information.
    Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
    Brain Sci; 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37508940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension.
    Menninghaus W; Bohrn IC; Knoop CA; Kotz SA; Schlotz W; Jacobs AM
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():48-60. PubMed ID: 26113449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbal memory and verbal fluency tasks used for language localization and lateralization during magnetoencephalography.
    Pirmoradi M; Jemel B; Gallagher A; Tremblay J; D'Hondt F; Nguyen DK; Béland R; Lassonde M
    Epilepsy Res; 2016 Jan; 119():1-9. PubMed ID: 26656177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using auditory-visual speech to probe the basis of noise-impaired consonant-vowel perception in dyslexia and auditory neuropathy.
    Ramirez J; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1122-33. PubMed ID: 16158666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.