These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30223418)

  • 1. A tentative efficiency index for pointing device use in computer aided design: A pilot study.
    Coelho DA; Lourenço ML
    Work; 2018; 61(1):157-170. PubMed ID: 30223418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usability Evaluation of Slanted Computer Mice.
    Lourenço ML; Lanhoso F; Coelho DA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33916935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posture and discomfort assessment in computer users while using touch screen device as compared with mouse-keyboard and touch pad-keyboard.
    Kargar N; Choobineh AR; Razeghi M; Keshavarzi S; Meftahi N
    Work; 2018; 59(3):341-349. PubMed ID: 29630576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement of operational efficiencies for people with high cervical spinal cord injuries using a flexible integrated pointing device apparatus.
    Chen CL; Chen HC; Cheng PT; Chen CY; Chen HC; Chou SW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 87(6):866-73. PubMed ID: 16731224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing learning during the familiarization phase with a slanted mouse and a vertical mouse when performing a repeated pointing-clicking task.
    Clarisse G; Cail F; Pascal W
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Mar; 28(1):333-342. PubMed ID: 32270750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment.
    Baldus T; Patterson P
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 18295185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and feasibility study of an integrated pointing device apparatus for individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Chen HC; Liu YP; Chen CL; Chen CY
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 16908006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pointing device usage guidelines for people with quadriplegia: a simulation and validation study utilizing an integrated pointing device apparatus.
    Chen HC; Chen CL; Lu CC; Wu CY
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Jun; 17(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19423450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the tip of the tongue: learning typing and pointing with an intra-oral computer interface.
    Caltenco HA; Breidegard B; Struijk LN
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 23931550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Design Contribution to Ergonomic PC Mice Development.
    Lourenço ML; Pitarma RA; Coelho DA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of flat, angled, and vertical computer mice and their effects on wrist posture, pointing performance, and preference.
    Odell D; Johnson P
    Work; 2015; 52(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26444940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pointing Device Performance in Steering Tasks.
    Senanayake R; Goonetilleke RS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Jun; 122(3):886-910. PubMed ID: 27216944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical evaluation of circling interface with head-mounted mouse emulator users.
    Ka HW; Simpson RC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jul; 12(5):469-479. PubMed ID: 27292928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative computer mouse designs: performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.
    Feathers DJ; Rollings K; Hedge A
    Work; 2013; 44 Suppl 1():S115-22. PubMed ID: 23241688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Circling motion and screen edges as an alternative input method for on-screen target manipulation.
    Ka HW; Simpson RC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Apr; 12(3):227-235. PubMed ID: 26776719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and validation of a desk-free and posture-independent input device.
    Lee YH; Su MC
    Appl Ergon; 2008 May; 39(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 18022139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of mouse slant and desktop position on muscular and postural stresses, subject preference and performance in women aged 18-40 years.
    Gaudez C; Cail F
    Ergonomics; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1473-1486. PubMed ID: 26847952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usability of touch-panel interfaces for older adults.
    Murata A; Iwase H
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):767-76. PubMed ID: 16553065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The form of augmented force-feedback fields and the efficiency and satisfaction in computer-aided pointing tasks.
    Keuning H; Monné TK; IJsselsteijn WA; Houtsma AJ
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):418-29. PubMed ID: 16170947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the performance of novel chorded keyboards in combination with pointing input devices.
    Shi WZ; Wu FG
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():1-7. PubMed ID: 25064640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.