These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30224676)

  • 1. Neural Signatures of the Configural Superiority Effect and Fundamental Emergent Features in Human Vision.
    Costa TL; Orsten-Hooge K; Gaudêncio Rêgo G; Wagemans J; R Pomerantz J; Sérgio Boggio P
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13954. PubMed ID: 30224676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibition drives configural superiority of illusory Gestalt: Combined behavioral and drift-diffusion model evidence.
    Nie QY; Maurer M; Müller HJ; Conci M
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():150-62. PubMed ID: 26896900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.
    Rousselet GA; Pernet CR; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18834518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergence of perceptual Gestalts in the human visual cortex: the case of the configural-superiority effect.
    Kubilius J; Wagemans J; Op de Beeck HP
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1296-303. PubMed ID: 21934133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional modulation of perceptual grouping in human visual cortex: ERP studies.
    Han S; Jiang Y; Mao L; Humphreys GW; Qin J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Nov; 26(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 15929087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of configural processing on the perceptual spatial resolution for face features.
    Namdar G; Avidan G; Ganel T
    Cortex; 2015 Nov; 72():115-123. PubMed ID: 25998751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is that a belt or a snake? Object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing.
    Zani A; Proverbio AM
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Feb; 8():6. PubMed ID: 22300540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can two dots form a Gestalt? Measuring emergent features with the capacity coefficient.
    Hawkins RXD; Houpt JW; Eidels A; Townsend JT
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():19-33. PubMed ID: 25986994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are objects the same as groups? ERP correlates of spatial attentional guidance by irrelevant feature similarity.
    Kasai T; Moriya H; Hirano S
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():49-58. PubMed ID: 21652032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gestalt perception modulates early visual processing.
    Herrmann CS; Bosch V
    Neuroreport; 2001 Apr; 12(5):901-4. PubMed ID: 11303756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accelerated and amplified neural responses in visual discrimination: Two features are processed faster than one.
    Lobaugh NJ; Chevalier H; Batty M; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):986-95. PubMed ID: 15961041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing links between visual short term memory, visual attention and cognitive control processes through practice: An electrophysiological insight.
    Fuggetta G; Duke PA
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():48-60. PubMed ID: 28396214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping the route to visual awareness.
    Hogendoorn H; Carlson TA; Verstraten FA
    J Vis; 2011 Nov; 11(13):. PubMed ID: 22052219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of hemispheric asymmetry in global and local information processing and interference in divided and selective attention using spatial frequency filters.
    Yoshida T; Yoshino A; Takahashi Y; Nomura S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):519-29. PubMed ID: 17476490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study.
    Heinze HJ; Hinrichs H; Scholz M; Burchert W; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jul; 10(4):485-98. PubMed ID: 9712678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Late positive component correlates of verbal and visuospatial processing.
    Rugg MD; Beaumont JG
    Biol Psychol; 1979 Jul; 9(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 534666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Separable mechanisms underlying global feature-based attention.
    Bondarenko R; Boehler CN; Stoppel CM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    J Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 32(44):15284-95. PubMed ID: 23115167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.