125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30225095)
1. A mixed methods exploratory study of women's relationships with and uses of fertility tracking apps.
Gambier-Ross K; McLernon DJ; Morgan HM
Digit Health; 2018; 4():2055207618785077. PubMed ID: 30225095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's perspectives on smartphone apps for fertility tracking and predicting conception: a mixed methods study.
Blair DL; Morgan HM; McLernon DJ
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Apr; 26(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33576699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "A good little tool to get to know yourself a bit better": a qualitative study on users' experiences of app-supported menstrual tracking in Europe.
Levy J; Romo-Avilés N
BMC Public Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):1213. PubMed ID: 31481043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. User profile and preferences in fertility apps for preventing pregnancy: an exploratory pilot study.
Starling MS; Kandel Z; Haile L; Simmons RG
Mhealth; 2018; 4():21. PubMed ID: 30050917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experiences of users of period tracking apps: which app, frequency of use, data input and output and attitudes.
Patel U; Broad A; Biswakarma R; Harper JC
Reprod Biomed Online; 2024 Mar; 48(3):103599. PubMed ID: 38295553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. mHealth and its application in menstrual related issues: a systematic review.
Kalampalikis A; Chatziioannou SS; Protopapas A; Gerakini AM; Michala L
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2022 Feb; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 34615425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Inequalities in the Use of Self-Tracking Diet and Fitness Apps: Interview Study on the Influence of Social, Economic, and Cultural Factors.
Régnier F; Chauvel L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e101. PubMed ID: 29678807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools.
Epstein DA; Lee NB; Kang JH; Agapie E; Schroeder J; Pina LR; Fogarty J; Kientz JA; Munson SA
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst; 2017 May; 2017():6876-6888. PubMed ID: 28516176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do fertility tracking applications offer women useful information about their fertile window?
Ali R; Gürtin ZB; Harper JC
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 34756400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of leveraging menstrual cycle tracking apps for preconception research recruitment.
Jukic AMZ; Jahnke HR; MacNell N; Bradley D; Malloy SM; Baird DD
Front Reprod Health; 2022; 4():981878. PubMed ID: 36303662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fertility and digital technology: narratives of using smartphone app 'Natural Cycles' while trying to conceive.
Grenfell P; Tilouche N; Shawe J; French RS
Sociol Health Illn; 2021 Jan; 43(1):116-132. PubMed ID: 33147647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's perceptions of the pill's potential health risks in Sri Lanka.
Thapa S; Salgado M; Fortney JA; Grubb GS; De Silva V
Asia Pac Popul J; 1987 Sep; 2(3):39-56. PubMed ID: 12268936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Goals, life events, and transitions: examining fertility apps for holistic health tracking.
Costa Figueiredo M; Huynh T; Takei A; Epstein DA; Chen Y
JAMIA Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):ooab013. PubMed ID: 33718804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fertility decline and modernization in Spanish society. A comparative analysis of the 1977 and 1985 fertility surveys].
Aguinaga Roustan J
Bol Asoc Demogr Hist; 1989; 7(3):7-22. PubMed ID: 12316188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contraception and women's health.
Fathalla MF
Br Med Bull; 1993 Jan; 49(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 8324613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's experiences of ovulation testing: a qualitative analysis.
Jones G; Carlton J; Weddell S; Johnson S; Ledger WL
Reprod Health; 2015 Dec; 12():116. PubMed ID: 26689590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fertility app for two? Women's perspectives on sharing conceptive fertility work with male partners.
Hamper J
Cult Health Sex; 2022 Dec; 24(12):1713-1728. PubMed ID: 34779718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fertility and infertility uses of menstrual apps from the perspectives of healthcare providers and patients.
Hohmann-Marriott B; Williams T; Girling J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38037495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Mobile App Design Impacts User Responses to Mixed Self-Tracking Outcomes: Randomized Online Experiment to Explore the Role of Spatial Distance for Hedonic Editing.
Imschloss M; Lorenz J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e81. PubMed ID: 29643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
