These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30225580)

  • 41. Semantic relations of the word in aphasics.
    Ogrezeanu V
    Rom J Neurol Psychiatry; 1990; 28(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 1706933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort.
    Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task.
    Barber HA; Otten LJ; Kousta ST; Vigliocco G
    Brain Lang; 2013 Apr; 125(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23454073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.
    Anton KF; Gould L; Borowsky R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):623-44. PubMed ID: 24294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world.
    Huettig F; Quinlan PT; McDonald SA; Altmann GT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jan; 121(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16098943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Lexical and gestural symbols in left-damaged patients.
    Papeo L; Rumiati RI
    Cortex; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23107378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Testing the semantic differential as a model of task processes with the implicit association test.
    Xiong MJ; Logan GD; Franks JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1452-63. PubMed ID: 17263070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lexical-semantic organization in bilingual children: evidence from a repeated word association task.
    Sheng L; McGregor KK; Marian V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):572-87. PubMed ID: 16787896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A neural signature of phonological access: distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming.
    Graves WW; Grabowski TJ; Mehta S; Gordon JK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 19(4):617-31. PubMed ID: 17381253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cross-language associative priming is influenced by language proficiency and executive control.
    Friesen DC; Haigh CA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Dec; 72(4):264-276. PubMed ID: 30307260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating feature-category relations using semantic fluency tasks.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 15919552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Trouble articulating the right words: Evidence for a response-exclusion account of distraction during semantic fluency.
    Marsh JE; Crawford JC; Pilgrim LK; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Oct; 58(5):367-372. PubMed ID: 28833228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Processing stages underlying word recognition in the anteroventral temporal lobe.
    Halgren E; Wang C; Schomer DL; Knake S; Marinkovic K; Wu J; Ulbert I
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1401-13. PubMed ID: 16488158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Testing the cognitive relevance of a geometric model on a word association task: a comparison of humans, ACOM, and LSA.
    Ji H; Lemaire B; Choo H; Ploux S
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):926-34. PubMed ID: 19001383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics.
    Marelli M; Baroni M
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Jul; 122(3):485-515. PubMed ID: 26120909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22936106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks.
    Sharma D; McKenna FP
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):1033-40. PubMed ID: 9796234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On the influence of typicality and age of acquisition on semantic processing: Diverging evidence from behavioural and ERP responses.
    Räling R; Holzgrefe-Lang J; Schröder A; Wartenburger I
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():186-200. PubMed ID: 26032580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.