BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30225604)

  • 1. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.
    Sebastian R; Howell MH; Chang KH; Adrales G; Magnuson T; Schweitzer M; Nguyen H
    Surg Endosc; 2019 May; 33(5):1600-1612. PubMed ID: 30225604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.
    Sebastian R; Ghanem OM; Cornejo J; Ruttger T; Mayuiers M; Adrales G; Li C
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6886-6895. PubMed ID: 35020060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
    Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Edwards MA
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1573-1584. PubMed ID: 31209611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
    Acevedo E; Lu X; Zhao H; Mazzei M; Sarvepalli S; Edwards MA
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2021 Mar; 17(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 33257274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion versus primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a propensity score matching analysis.
    O'Laughlin M; Cornejo J; Zevallos A; Coker A; Schweitzer M; Adrales G; Li C; Sebastian R
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7947-7954. PubMed ID: 37433912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
    Chaar ME; Lundberg P; Stoltzfus J
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 May; 14(5):545-551. PubMed ID: 29551470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-y gastric bypass: results from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program data registry.
    Papasavas P; Seip RL; Stone A; Staff I; McLaughlin T; Tishler D
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Aug; 15(8):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 31477248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database.
    Nasser H; Munie S; Kindel TL; Gould JC; Higgins RM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Mar; 16(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 31932204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Short-term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited Centers.
    Jung JJ; Park AK; Witkowski ER; Hutter MM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2022 Mar; 18(3):326-334. PubMed ID: 34896012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.
    Rahimi AO; Ashouri Y; Maegawa F; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I
    Obes Surg; 2023 Sep; 33(9):2671-2678. PubMed ID: 37434018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Approach Using a Standardized Definition: First Look at the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) Data.
    El Chaar M; Petrick A; Clapp B; Stoltzfus J; Alvarado LA
    Obes Surg; 2023 Jul; 33(7):2025-2039. PubMed ID: 37184827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery Justified? An MBSAQIP Analysis.
    Seton T; Mahan M; Dove J; Villanueva H; Obradovic V; Falvo A; Horsley R; Petrick A; Parker DM
    Obes Surg; 2022 Dec; 32(12):3863-3868. PubMed ID: 36264443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.
    Tatarian T; Yang J; Wang J; Docimo S; Talamini M; Pryor AD; Spaniolas K
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3915-3922. PubMed ID: 32737605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perioperative safety of laparoscopic versus robotic gastric bypass: a propensity matched analysis of early experience.
    Celio AC; Kasten KR; Schwoerer A; Pories WJ; Spaniolas K
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1847-1852. PubMed ID: 28844577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Longitudinal Efficiency of Robotic Surgery: an MBSAQIP Propensity Matched 4-Year Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.
    Dudash M; Kuhn J; Dove J; Fluck M; Horsley R; Gabrielsen J; Daouadi M; Petrick AT; Parker DM
    Obes Surg; 2020 Oct; 30(10):3706-3713. PubMed ID: 32495073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic platform for gastric bypass is associated with more resource utilization: an analysis of MBSAQIP dataset.
    Sharma G; Strong AT; Tu C; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR; Aminian A
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Mar; 14(3):304-310. PubMed ID: 29276076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database.
    Coker A; Sebastian R; Tatum J; Cornejo J; Zevallos A; Li C; Schweitzer M; Adrales G
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7970-7979. PubMed ID: 37439819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients: first report based on MBSAQIP database.
    Pastrana M; Stoltzfus J; Claros L; El Chaar M
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Jan; 16(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31767380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bariatric surgery in the elderly: outcomes analysis of patients over 70 using the ACS-NSQIP database.
    Pechman DM; Muñoz Flores F; Kinkhabwala CM; Salas R; Berk RH; Weithorn D; Camacho DR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Nov; 15(11):1923-1932. PubMed ID: 31611184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
    Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Soans R; Edwards MA
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 31209608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 83.