These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3022567)
1. Worldwide method effectiveness of the Today vaginal contraceptive sponge. McClure DA; Edelman DA Adv Contracept; 1985 Dec; 1(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 3022567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonprescription vaginal contraception. Edelman DA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 6110578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lea's Shield: a study of the safety and efficacy of a new vaginal barrier contraceptive used with and without spermicide. Mauck C; Glover LH; Miller E; Allen S; Archer DF; Blumenthal P; Rosenzweig A; Dominik R; Sturgen K; Cooper J; Fingerhut F; Peacock L; Gabelnick HL Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 8773419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Yugoslavian experience with the contraceptive sponge. Borko E; Behlilovic B Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1986 Oct; 24(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 2880769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sponge subject of research, controversy in second year. Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Jul; 6(7):93-6. PubMed ID: 12280148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Leads from the MMWR. Toxic-shock syndrome and the vaginal contraceptive sponge. JAMA; 1984 Feb; 251(8):1015-6. PubMed ID: 6319769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative trial of the Today contraceptive sponge and diaphragm. Edelman DA; McIntyre SL; Harper J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Dec; 150(7):869-76. PubMed ID: 6095664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polyurethane contraceptive vaginal sponge: product modifications resulting from user experience. Aznar R; Zamora G; Lozano M; Levi C Contraception; 1981 Sep; 24(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 7030612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxic-shock syndrome and the vaginal contraceptive sponge. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1984 Feb; 33(4):43-4, 49. PubMed ID: 6318070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parity and use-effectiveness with the contraceptive sponge. McIntyre SL; Higgins JE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 155(4):796-801. PubMed ID: 3020983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A vaginal contraceptive sponge. Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1983 Aug; 25(642):78-80. PubMed ID: 6308405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The vaginal contraceptive sponge. Edelman DA IPPF Med Bull; 1984 Jun; 18(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12266284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sponge versus diaphragm for contraception. Kuyoh MA; Toroitich-Ruto C; Grimes DA; Schulz KF; Gallo MG Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; 2002(3):CD003172. PubMed ID: 12137678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative clinical trial of the contraceptive sponge and Neo Sampoon tablets. Borko E; McIntyre SL; Feldblum PJ Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 2984617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of nonoxynol 9 contraceptive sponge use in preventing heterosexual acquisition of HIV in Nairobi prostitutes. Kreiss J; Ngugi E; Holmes K; Ndinya-Achola J; Waiyaki P; Roberts PL; Ruminjo I; Sajabi R; Kimata J; Fleming TR JAMA; 1992 Jul 22-29; 268(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 1320133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toxic shock syndrome and the vaginal contraceptive sponge. Faich G; Pearson K; Fleming D; Sobel S; Anello C JAMA; 1986 Jan; 255(2):216-8. PubMed ID: 3001376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of the intravaginal insert (IVI): acceptability, side effects, and post-coital spermicidal activity. Ahmad M; Asch RH Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 6099026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal contraceptives. Effective protection from sexually transmitted diseases for women? North BB J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2834553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]