224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30225675)
1. SMART (SiMulAtion and ReconsTruction) PET: an efficient PET simulation-reconstruction tool.
Pfaehler E; De Jong JR; Dierckx RAJO; van Velden FHP; Boellaard R
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Sep; 5(1):16. PubMed ID: 30225675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Reconstruction Algorithms to Validate the NEMA Phantom Results in Clinical Scenario - A Comparative Study Using Time-of-Flight versus Non-Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.
Kumar A; Jacob P; Watts A; Joseph A; Kaur H; Hooda M; Kaur A; Singh B
Indian J Nucl Med; 2022; 37(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 35982821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total-body
Hu P; Zhang Y; Yu H; Chen S; Tan H; Qi C; Dong Y; Wang Y; Deng Z; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2384-2394. PubMed ID: 33866409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Penalized maximum likelihood simultaneous longitudinal PET image reconstruction with difference-image priors.
Ellis S; Reader AJ
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3001-3018. PubMed ID: 29697144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization.
Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Elosúa C; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Domínguez-Prado I; Vigil C; García-Velloso MJ; Arbizu J; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092503. PubMed ID: 25186412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial evaluation of the Celesteion large-bore PET/CT scanner in accordance with the NEMA NU2-2012 standard and the Japanese guideline for oncology FDG PET/CT data acquisition protocol version 2.0.
Kaneta T; Ogawa M; Motomura N; Iizuka H; Arisawa T; Hino-Shishikura A; Yoshida K; Inoue T
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Oct; 7(1):83. PubMed ID: 29022216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of activity, scan duration and patient's body mass index in the optimization of FDG imaging protocols on a TOF-PET/CT scanner.
Matheoud R; Al-Maymani N; Oldani A; Sacchetti GM; Brambilla M; Carriero A
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Apr; 8(1):35. PubMed ID: 33825058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PETSTEP: Generation of synthetic PET lesions for fast evaluation of segmentation methods.
Berthon B; Häggström I; Apte A; Beattie BJ; Kirov AS; Humm JL; Marshall C; Spezi E; Larsson A; Schmidtlein CR
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):969-980. PubMed ID: 26321409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GATE Monte Carlo simulations for variations of an integrated PET/MR hybrid imaging system based on the Biograph mMR model.
Aklan B; Jakoby BW; Watson CC; Braun H; Ritt P; Quick HH
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4731-52. PubMed ID: 26040657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harmonizing standardized uptake value recovery between two PET/CT systems from different manufacturers when using resolution modelling and time-of-flight.
Armstrong IS; Thomson KE; Rowley LM; McGowan DR
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jul; 38(7):650-655. PubMed ID: 28445243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
