208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30225798)
1. The increase of stage, grading, and metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the last decade.
Beck V; Schlenker B; Herlemann A; Apfelbeck M; Buchner A; Gratzke C; Stief CG; Tritschler S
World J Urol; 2019 Jun; 37(6):1103-1109. PubMed ID: 30225798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yoneyama T; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
Scand J Urol; 2015 Apr; 49(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25165894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Thomas C; Pfirrmann K; Pieles F; Bogumil A; Gillitzer R; Wiesner C; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21592293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the percentage of biopsy cores positive for cancer, pretreatment PSA, and highest biopsy Gleason sum to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy: the Center for Prostate Disease Research nomograms.
Gancarczyk KJ; Wu H; McLeod DG; Kane C; Kusuda L; Lance R; Herring J; Foley J; Baldwin D; Bishoff JT; Soderdahl D; Moul JW
Urology; 2003 Mar; 61(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 12639653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Migration in last decade to high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Patard PM; Roumiguié M; Prudhomme T; Doumerc N; Thoulouzan M; Gamé X; de la Taille A; Rischmann P; Soulié M; Salomon L; Beauval JB
Prog Urol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 30337057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Prostate Specific Antigen Level on Oncological Outcomes after Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Sungur M; Caliskan S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2019 Apr; 29(4):361-364. PubMed ID: 30925962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.
Norman Z; Militza P; Andres F; Daniela F; Alejandro M; Catherine S; Juan F
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24856482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades.
Fossati N; Passoni NM; Moschini M; Gandaglia G; Larcher A; Freschi M; Guazzoni G; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2016 May; 117(5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25787671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Herlemann A; Buchner A; Kretschmer A; Apfelbeck M; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Tritschler S
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 28493044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trend of Adverse Stage Migration in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Preisser F; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Tian Z; Saad F; Pompe RS; Briganti A; Budäus L; Montorsi F; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 31100241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
