222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30225900)
1. Positive effect of progesterone on motility and velocity of fresh, vitrified without permeable cryoprotectants and frozen with permeable cryoprotectants human spermatozoa.
Saymé N; Dite L; Krebs T; Kljajić M; Maas DHA
Andrologia; 2018 Dec; 50(10):e13133. PubMed ID: 30225900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification.
Rosato MP; Iaffaldano N
Theriogenology; 2013 Feb; 79(3):508-16. PubMed ID: 23218394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved cryopreservation of spermatozoa using vitrification: comparison of cryoprotectants and a novel device for long-term storage.
O'Neill HC; Nikoloska M; Ho H; Doshi A; Maalouf W
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Aug; 36(8):1713-1720. PubMed ID: 31273587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method for native human sperm.
Aizpurua J; Medrano L; Enciso M; Sarasa J; Romero A; Fernández MA; Gómez-Torres MJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 28938751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cryopreservation media differentially affect sperm motility, morphology and DNA integrity.
Raad G; Lteif L; Lahoud R; Azoury J; Azoury J; Tanios J; Hazzouri M; Azoury J
Andrology; 2018 Nov; 6(6):836-845. PubMed ID: 30105872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional freezing vs. cryoprotectant-free vitrification of epididymal (MESA) and testicular (TESE) spermatozoa: Three live births.
Spis E; Bushkovskaia A; Isachenko E; Todorov P; Sanchez R; Skopets V; Isachenko V
Cryobiology; 2019 Oct; 90():100-102. PubMed ID: 31419408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of some biochemical and functional effects of cryopreservation of human spermatozoa using an automated freezing-quick-thawing method.
Morshedi M; Oehninger S; Blackmore P; Bocca S; Coddington C; Hodgen G
Int J Androl; 1995 Dec; 18(6):279-86. PubMed ID: 8719843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional slow freezing cryopreserves mouflon spermatozoa better than vitrification.
Pradiee J; Esteso MC; Castaño C; Toledano-Díaz A; Lopez-Sebastián A; Guerra R; Santiago-Moreno J
Andrologia; 2017 Apr; 49(3):. PubMed ID: 27375281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vitrification and conventional freezing methods in sperm cryopreservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li YX; Zhou L; Lv MQ; Ge P; Liu YC; Zhou DX
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():84-92. PubMed ID: 30580229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vitrification of dog spermatozoa: Effects of two cryoprotectants (sucrose or trehalose) and two warming procedures.
Caturla-Sánchez E; Sánchez-Calabuig MJ; Pérez-Gutiérrez JF; Cerdeira J; Castaño C; Santiago-Moreno J
Cryobiology; 2018 Feb; 80():126-129. PubMed ID: 29126865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification.
Isachenko E; Isachenko V; Katkov II; Rahimi G; Schöndorf T; Mallmann P; Dessole S; Nawroth F
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 15016773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vitrification of human ICSI/IVF spermatozoa without cryoprotectants: new capillary technology.
Isachenko V; Maettner R; Petrunkina AM; Sterzik K; Mallmann P; Rahimi G; Sanchez R; Risopatron J; Damjanoski I; Isachenko E
J Androl; 2012; 33(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 21719694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification versus conventional rapid freezing: Effects on motility, viability, morphology and cellular defects.
Le MT; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen TT; Nguyen VT; Nguyen TTA; Nguyen VQH; Cao NT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():14-20. PubMed ID: 30640121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rhesus monkey sperm cryopreservation with TEST-yolk extender in the absence of permeable cryoprotectant.
Dong Q; Correa LM; VandeVoort CA
Cryobiology; 2009 Feb; 58(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 18992734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cryoprotectants-Free Vitrification and Conventional Freezing of Human Spermatozoa: A Comparative Transcript Profiling.
Wang M; Todorov P; Wang W; Isachenko E; Rahimi G; Mallmann P; Isachenko V
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 35328464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa in large (up to 0.5 mL) volume: a novel technology.
Isachenko V; Maettner R; Petrunkina AM; Mallmann P; Rahimi G; Sterzik K; Sanchez R; Risopatron J; Damjanoski I; Isachenko E
Clin Lab; 2011; 57(9-10):643-50. PubMed ID: 22029178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retained functional integrity of bull spermatozoa after double freezing and thawing using PureSperm density gradient centrifugation.
Maxwell WM; Parrilla I; Caballero I; Garcia E; Roca J; Martinez EA; Vazquez JM; Rath D
Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Oct; 42(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17845604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of vitrification on ram spermatozoa using free-egg yolk extenders.
Jiménez-Rabadán P; García-Álvarez O; Vidal A; Maroto-Morales A; Iniesta-Cuerda M; Ramón M; del Olmo E; Fernández-Santos R; Garde JJ; Soler AJ
Cryobiology; 2015 Aug; 71(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 26004240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of some permeating cryoprotectants on CASA motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
Awad MM
Anim Reprod Sci; 2011 Feb; 123(3-4):157-62. PubMed ID: 21288669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motility and cryopreservation of spermatozoa of European common frog, Rana temporaria.
Mansour N; Lahnsteiner F; Patzner RA
Theriogenology; 2010 Sep; 74(5):724-32. PubMed ID: 20537698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
