338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30226026)
1. New mitochondrial primers for metabarcoding of insects, designed and evaluated using in silico methods.
Marquina D; Andersson AF; Ronquist F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 30226026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias.
Clarke LJ; Soubrier J; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1160-70. PubMed ID: 24751203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PCR primers for the amplification of four insect mitochondrial gene fragments.
Kambhampati S; Smith PT
Insect Mol Biol; 1995 Nov; 4(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 8825760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The choice of universal primers and the characteristics of the species mixture determine when DNA metabarcoding can be quantitative.
Piñol J; Senar MA; Symondson WOC
Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 29939447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collecting in collections: a PCR strategy and primer set for DNA barcoding of decades-old dried museum specimens.
Mitchell A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Sep; 15(5):1102-11. PubMed ID: 25644663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of four DNA fragments (COI, 16S rDNA, ITS2, 12S rDNA) for species identification of the Ixodida (Acari: Ixodida).
Lv J; Wu S; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Feng C; Yuan X; Jia G; Deng J; Wang C; Wang Q; Mei L; Lin X
Parasit Vectors; 2014 Mar; 7():93. PubMed ID: 24589289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance comparison of genetic markers for high-throughput sequencing-based biodiversity assessment in complex communities.
Zhan A; Bailey SA; Heath DD; Macisaac HJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Sep; 14(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 24655333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seafood Identification in Multispecies Products: Assessment of 16SrRNA, cytb, and COI Universal Primers' Efficiency as a Preliminary Analytical Step for Setting up Metabarcoding Next-Generation Sequencing Techniques.
Giusti A; Tinacci L; Sotelo CG; Marchetti M; Guidi A; Zheng W; Armani A
J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Apr; 65(13):2902-2912. PubMed ID: 28290697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metabarcoding of marine environmental DNA based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes.
Günther B; Knebelsberger T; Neumann H; Laakmann S; Martínez Arbizu P
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):14822. PubMed ID: 30287908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vector soup: high-throughput identification of Neotropical phlebotomine sand flies using metabarcoding.
Kocher A; Gantier JC; Gaborit P; Zinger L; Holota H; Valiere S; Dusfour I; Girod R; Bañuls AL; Murienne J
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):172-182. PubMed ID: 27292284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PacBio metabarcoding of Fungi and other eukaryotes: errors, biases and perspectives.
Tedersoo L; Tooming-Klunderud A; Anslan S
New Phytol; 2018 Feb; 217(3):1370-1385. PubMed ID: 28906012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the 16S rDNA and COI DNA barcoding technique for rapid molecular identification of stored product psocids (Insecta: Psocodea: Liposcelididae).
Yang Q; Zhao S; Kucerová Z; Stejskal V; Opit G; Qin M; Cao Y; Li F; Li Z
J Econ Entomol; 2013 Feb; 106(1):419-25. PubMed ID: 23448059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The design and testing of mini-barcode markers in marine lobsters.
Govender A; Groeneveld J; Singh S; Willows-Munro S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210492. PubMed ID: 30677051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match.
Deagle BE; Jarman SN; Coissac E; Pompanon F; Taberlet P
Biol Lett; 2014 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 25209199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bushmeat genetics: setting up a reference framework for the DNA typing of African forest bushmeat.
Gaubert P; Njiokou F; Olayemi A; Pagani P; Dufour S; Danquah E; Nutsuakor ME; Ngua G; Missoup AD; Tedesco PA; Dernat R; Antunes A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 May; 15(3):633-51. PubMed ID: 25264212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement.
Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding of Foraminifera communities using taxon-specific primers.
Macher JN; Bloska DM; Holzmann M; Girard EB; Pawlowski J; Renema W
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13952. PubMed ID: 36093332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A set of nematode rRNA cistron databases and a primer assessment tool to enable more flexible and comprehensive metabarcoding.
Charrier E; Chen R; Thundathil N; Gilleard JS
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e13965. PubMed ID: 38733216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-read DNA metabarcoding of ribosomal RNA in the analysis of fungi from aquatic environments.
Heeger F; Bourne EC; Baschien C; Yurkov A; Bunk B; Spröer C; Overmann J; Mazzoni CJ; Monaghan MT
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1500-1514. PubMed ID: 30106226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
