117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30227189)
1. Assessment of clinician accuracy for diagnosing melanoma on the basis of electrical impedance spectroscopy score plus morphology versus lesion morphology alone.
Svoboda RM; Prado G; Mirsky RS; Rigel DS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Jan; 80(1):285-287. PubMed ID: 30227189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.
Sarac E; Meiwes A; Eigentler T; Forchhammer S; Kofler L; Häfner HM; Garbe C
Acta Derm Venereol; 2020 Nov; 100(18):adv00328. PubMed ID: 33170302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical impedance spectroscopy and the diagnostic accuracy for malignant melanoma.
Aberg P; Birgersson U; Elsner P; Mohr P; Ollmar S
Exp Dermatol; 2011 Aug; 20(8):648-52. PubMed ID: 21539620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Skin Cancer Diagnosis.
Braun RP; Mangana J; Goldinger S; French L; Dummer R; Marghoob AA
Dermatol Clin; 2017 Oct; 35(4):489-493. PubMed ID: 28886804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical impedance spectroscopy as a potential adjunct diagnostic tool for cutaneous melanoma.
Mohr P; Birgersson U; Berking C; Henderson C; Trefzer U; Kemeny L; Sunderkötter C; Dirschka T; Motley R; Frohm-Nilsson M; Reinhold U; Loquai C; Braun R; Nyberg F; Paoli J
Skin Res Technol; 2013 May; 19(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 23350668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective evaluation of the performance of the electrical impedance spectroscopy system Nevisense in detecting keratinocyte cancers.
Liebich C; von Bruehl ML; Schubert I; Oberhoffer R; Sander C
Skin Res Technol; 2021 Sep; 27(5):723-729. PubMed ID: 33511695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Strategies for the noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma].
Fink C; Haenssle HA
Hautarzt; 2016 Jul; 67(7):519-28. PubMed ID: 27193101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-invasive identification of melanoma with near-infrared and skin impedance spectroscopy.
Bodén I; Nyström J; Lundskog B; Zazo V; Geladi P; Lindholm-Sethson B; Naredi P
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e473-8. PubMed ID: 22958059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of electrical impedance spectroscopy on dermatologists' number needed to biopsy metric and biopsy decisions for pigmented skin lesions.
Litchman GH; Teplitz RW; Marson JW; Rigel DS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Oct; 85(4):976-979. PubMed ID: 32926981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of an electrical impedance spectroscopy system in short-term digital dermoscopy imaging of melanocytic lesions.
Rocha L; Menzies SW; Lo S; Avramidis M; Khoury R; Jackett L; Guitera P
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Nov; 177(5):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 28421597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. En route to a new in vivo diagnostic of malignant pigmented melanoma.
Scholz M; Stankovic G; Scholz C; Leupold D; Buder S; Kohl P; Eichhorn R; Stuecker M; Hoffmann K
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res; 2012 Mar; 25(2):281-3. PubMed ID: 22221910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Melanoma: issues of importance to the clinician.
Davis NC
Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Mar; 33(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 3986411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin cancer identification using multifrequency electrical impedance--a potential screening tool.
Aberg P; Nicander I; Hansson J; Geladi P; Holmgren U; Ollmar S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2097-102. PubMed ID: 15605856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of full skin examination in diagnosing cutaneous melanoma.
Woo WA; Mitchell CD; Wakefield E; Hextall J
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2017 Aug; 42(6):674-675. PubMed ID: 28589654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a quantitative analysis of skin lesion images.
Caputo B; Panichelli V; Gigante GE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 90():509-13. PubMed ID: 15460746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo assessment of optical properties of melanocytic skin lesions and differentiation of melanoma from non-malignant lesions by high-definition optical coherence tomography.
Boone MA; Suppa M; Dhaenens F; Miyamoto M; Marneffe A; Jemec GB; Del Marmol V; Nebosis R
Arch Dermatol Res; 2016 Jan; 308(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 26563265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dermoscopic versus the clinical diagnosis of melanoma.
Benelli C; Roscetti E; Pozzo VD; Gasparini G; Cavicchini S
Eur J Dermatol; 1999 Sep; 9(6):470-6. PubMed ID: 10491506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma.
Fink C; Haenssle HA
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):261-271. PubMed ID: 27878858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reliability of clinical diagnosis in malignant melanoma].
Korom I; Gaszner G; Haraszti G; Szekeres L; Bertényi C; Dobozy A
Orv Hetil; 1993 Jun; 134(24):1309-11. PubMed ID: 8332348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a program for the automatic dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma in a general dermatology setting.
Fueyo-Casado A; Vázquez-López F; Sanchez-Martin J; Garcia-Garcia B; Pérez-Oliva N
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):257-9; discussion 260-2. PubMed ID: 19215265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
