These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30227419)

  • 41. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
    Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study.
    Kisiangani I; Mohamed SF; Kyobutungi C; Tindana P; Ghansah A; Ramsay M; Asiki G
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):27. PubMed ID: 35300680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Human subject protections in genetic research.
    Coffey MJ; Ross L
    Genet Test; 2004; 8(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 15345122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Researcher and institutional review board perspectives on the benefits and challenges of reporting back biomonitoring and environmental exposure results.
    Ohayon JL; Cousins E; Brown P; Morello-Frosch R; Brody JG
    Environ Res; 2017 Feb; 153():140-149. PubMed ID: 27960129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.
    Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Bytautas JP
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2010 Aug; 18(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 20234389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Navigating the Intersection between Genomic Research and Clinical Practice.
    Daly MB
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2020 Mar; 13(3):219-222. PubMed ID: 32132115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Do N-of-1 Trials Need IRB Review?
    Cen R; Hussain A; Pak KJ; Mitchell G; Nikles J; Gaudreau S; Bazzano LA; Breault JL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 27534588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
    Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Participants' Role Expectations in Genetics Research and Re-consent: Revising the Theory and Methods of Mental Models Research Relating to Roles.
    Condit CM; Shen L; Edwards KL; Bowen DJ; Korngiebel DM; Johnson CO
    J Health Commun; 2016; 21(sup2):16-24. PubMed ID: 27653592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
    Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genomic Literacy and Awareness of Ethical Guidance for Genomic Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: How Prepared Are Biomedical Researchers?
    Ogunrin O; Taiwo F; Frith L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Feb; 14(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 30358478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Professionals' attitudes regarding large-scale genetic information generated through next generation sequencing in research: a pilot study.
    Miller J; Soulier A; Bertier G; Cambon-Thomsen A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 25746785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 'Ethical responsibility' or 'a whole can of worms': differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members.
    Cole C; Petree LE; Phillips JP; Shoemaker JM; Holdsworth M; Helitzer DL
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 41(10):841-7. PubMed ID: 26063579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics.
    Cho MK
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):280-5, 212. PubMed ID: 18547195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Practices and Attitudes toward Returning Genomic Research Results to Low-Resource Research Participants.
    Raymond MB; Cooper KE; Parker LS; Bonham VL
    Public Health Genomics; 2021; 24(5-6):241-252. PubMed ID: 34229325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinician educators' experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey.
    Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Papp KK; Durning SJ
    Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 18520468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perspectives of psychiatric investigators and IRB chairs regarding benefits of psychiatric genetics research.
    Roberts LW; Dunn LB; Kim JP; Rostami M
    J Psychiatr Res; 2018 Nov; 106():54-60. PubMed ID: 30273801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.
    Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. What Can IRBs Learn From CABs? A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Recruitment and Training of Nonscientist Members on Research Review Boards.
    Solomon Cargill S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 29226746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Community members' engagement with and involvement in genomic research: lessons to learn from the field.
    Folayan MO; Oyedeji KS; Fatusi OA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2015 Apr; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23594220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.