144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30230718)
41. PPR option 3 offers organizations more choice for completing requirement.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jun; 24(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 15214246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Joint Commission launches Standards Improvement Initiative.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Oct; 26(10):1. PubMed ID: 17139923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. New health care regulations.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2004 Jan; 21(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 14712628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Correction to accreditation decision in Early Survey Policy Option 2.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jun; 24(6):3-4. PubMed ID: 15282886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Taking a second look at Joint Commission standards.
Clark JS
J AHIMA; 2002 Jan; 73(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 12469660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. E-SOC gets a facelift. Small changes enhance user experience.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2013 Oct; 33(10):6-8, 11. PubMed ID: 24294667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Challenging ambulatory care standards: tips for better compliance.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 10182305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Joint Commission's Wyatt says collaboration is the key.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2012 Oct; 37(10):109-11. PubMed ID: 23097794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Top standards compliance issues for first half of 2013.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1, 6-11. PubMed ID: 24052994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Prepare for periodic performance review.
Christiansen DA;
Nurs Manage; 2003 Oct; 34(10):14. PubMed ID: 14557774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Performance improvement: a topic whose time has come--again.
Stiefel RH
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2010; 44(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 20586395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Articles misconstrue Joint Commission's position on quality improvement.
O'Leary DS
Jt Comm Perspect; 1992; 12(6):2-3, 13. PubMed ID: 10123607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Compliance data for the Joint Commission's 2003 National Patient Safety Goals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 15484657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Corrections to 2004 requirements.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jun; 24(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 15282888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Navigating through JCAH's new quality assurance and medical staff standards.
Gosfield AG
Healthspan; 1987 Feb; 4(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 10289745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Monitoring compliance with JCAHO standards using a medication-control review tool.
Kowiatek JG; Weber RJ; Schilling DE; McKaveney TP
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2002 Sep; 59(18):1763-7. PubMed ID: 12298115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Nebulous guidelines leave room for interpretation.
QRC Advis; 1993 Feb; 9(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 10124353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Big changes are coming in 1994 accreditation manual.
Mathias JM
OR Manager; 1992 Nov; 8(11):13-4. PubMed ID: 10124063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. New JCAH standards stress quality and flexibility.
Umbdenstock RJ; Mohr BJ
Trustee; 1979 Dec; 32(12):16-9. PubMed ID: 10289237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Identifying indicators for aspects of care.
Fernsebner B
OR Manager; 1990 Aug; 6(8):16-7. PubMed ID: 10105832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
