These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Schmitt DP; Buss DM J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Jun; 70(6):1185-204. PubMed ID: 8667162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolution of human mate choice. Geary DC; Vigil J; Byrd-Craven J J Sex Res; 2004 Feb; 41(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 15216422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships. Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics. Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market. Conroy-Beam D Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):252-264. PubMed ID: 29082804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Gangestad SW; Simpson JA Behav Brain Sci; 2000 Aug; 23(4):573-87; discussion 587-644. PubMed ID: 11301543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin. Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ Science; 2022 Jan; 375(6578):eabi6308. PubMed ID: 35050648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: a review. Havlicek J; Roberts SC Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2009 May; 34(4):497-512. PubMed ID: 19054623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nifty ways to leave your lover: The tactics people use to entice and disguise the process of human mate poaching. Schmitt DP; Shackelford TK Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(8):1018-35. PubMed ID: 15189620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Buss DM; Schmitt DP Psychol Rev; 1993 Apr; 100(2):204-32. PubMed ID: 8483982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals. Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice. Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Gildersleeve K; Haselton MG; Fales MR Psychol Bull; 2014 Sep; 140(5):1205-59. PubMed ID: 24564172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of resource-gaining capacity on mate preferences: an eye tracking study. Zhao Z; Su W; Hou J BMC Psychol; 2023 Dec; 11(1):444. PubMed ID: 38111064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Role of Sexual and Romantic Attraction in Human Mate Preferences. Scheller M; de Sousa AA; Brotto LA; Little AC J Sex Res; 2024 Feb; 61(2):299-312. PubMed ID: 36795115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Zentner M; Mitura K Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1176-85. PubMed ID: 22933455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]