These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30230999)

  • 21. Mate choice: from sexual cues to cognitive adaptations.
    Miller GF
    Ciba Found Symp; 1997; 208():71-82; discussion 82-7. PubMed ID: 9386908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adaptive mating strategies and the problem of mate retention.
    Husárová B
    Anthropol Anz; 2005 Sep; 63(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16176054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jul; 111(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27337140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 33057831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of multiple cues in mate choice.
    Candolin U
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2003 Nov; 78(4):575-95. PubMed ID: 14700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Equilibrium population dynamics when mating is by mutual choice based on age.
    Alpern S; Katrantzi I; Ramsey D
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Jun; 94():63-72. PubMed ID: 23541396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?
    Stulp G; Buunk AP; Pollet TV; Nettle D; Verhulst S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54186. PubMed ID: 23342102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Same-sex gaze attraction influences mate-choice copying in humans.
    Yorzinski JL; Platt ML
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9115. PubMed ID: 20161739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evolutionary psychology of human mating: a response to Buller's critique.
    Klasios J
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Sep; 47 Pt A():1-11. PubMed ID: 24927270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Women's perceptions of sexual exploitability cues and their link to sexual attractiveness.
    Goetz CD; Easton JA; Buss DM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):999-1008. PubMed ID: 24217951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing implicit mate preferences among Chinese and Japanese women by providing love, sex, or money cues.
    Jin Z; Shiomura K; Jiang L
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Feb; 116(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 25588065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sexually dimorphic preference for altruism in the opposite sex according to recipient.
    Oda R; Shibata A; Kiyonari T; Takeda M; Matsumoto-Oda A
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Nov; 104(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 24094285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mate retention tactics in Spain: personality, sex differences, and relationship status.
    de Miguel A; Buss DM
    J Pers; 2011 Jun; 79(3):563-85. PubMed ID: 21534964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceived Effectiveness of Flirtation Tactics: The Effects of sex, Mating Context and Individual Differences in US and Norwegian Samples.
    Kennair LEO; Wade TJ; Tallaksen MT; Grøntvedt TV; Kessler AM; Burch RL; Bendixen M
    Evol Psychol; 2022; 20(1):14747049221088011. PubMed ID: 35331044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.
    Gosden TP; Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2106-12. PubMed ID: 25078542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
    Vanderlaan DP; Vasey PL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Aug; 37(4):572-85. PubMed ID: 17216358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ovulation, Sex Hormones, and Women's Mating Psychology.
    Jones BC; Hahn AC; DeBruine LM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 23(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 30477896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.