These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30232043)

  • 1. Verbal behavior and risky choice in humans: Exploring the boundaries of the description-experience gap.
    Cox DJ; Dallery J
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():301-308. PubMed ID: 30232043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mind the gap? Description, experience, and the continuum of uncertainty in risky choice.
    Camilleri AR; Newell BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():55-71. PubMed ID: 23317826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What the Future Holds and When: A Description-Experience Gap in Intertemporal Choice.
    Dai J; Pachur T; Pleskac TJ; Hertwig R
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1218-1233. PubMed ID: 31318637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probabilistic discounting in "certain gain-uncertain loss" and "certain loss-uncertain gain" conditions.
    Ostaszewski P; Bialaszek W
    Behav Processes; 2010 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 20083171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Of black swans and tossed coins: is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events?
    Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e20262. PubMed ID: 21673807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.
    Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):262-279. PubMed ID: 29120214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future is risky: discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes.
    Blackburn M; El-Deredy W
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():9-18. PubMed ID: 23201372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of memory in distinguishing risky decisions from experience and description.
    Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 27602887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The description-experience gap in risky choice in nonhuman primates.
    Heilbronner SR; Hayden BY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 26286883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When immediate losses are followed by delayed gains: Additive hyperboloid discounting models.
    Estle SJ; Green L; Myerson J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1418-1425. PubMed ID: 31012080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Bujold PM; Schultz W
    J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(15):2915-2929. PubMed ID: 30705103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical tests of fuzzy trace theory in brain and behavior: uncertainty across time, probability, and development.
    Reyna VF; Müller SM; Edelson SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 23(3):746-772. PubMed ID: 36828988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice.
    Glöckner A; Hilbig BE; Henninger F; Fiedler S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Apr; 145(4):486-508. PubMed ID: 26974209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision making under risk: framing effects in pigeon risk preferences.
    Clayton WD; Brantley SM; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Oct; 25(5):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 35296920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probability discounting of gains and losses: implications for risk attitudes and impulsivity.
    Shead NW; Hodgins DC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Jul; 92(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 20119519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: effects of age and ADHD symptoms.
    Scheres A; Dijkstra M; Ainslie E; Balkan J; Reynolds B; Sonuga-Barke E; Castellanos FX
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(11):2092-103. PubMed ID: 16303152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative gains, losses, and reference points in probabilistic choice in rats.
    Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117697. PubMed ID: 25658448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural mechanism of intertemporal choice: from discounting future gains to future losses.
    Xu L; Liang ZY; Wang K; Li S; Jiang T
    Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1261():65-74. PubMed ID: 19185567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses.
    Mitchell SH; Wilson VB
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 19766702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The power of nothing: Risk preference in pigeons, but not people, is driven primarily by avoidance of zero outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):431-445. PubMed ID: 31414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.