461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30232129)
21. Evaluation of the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile.
Shin BM; Lee EJ; Moon JW; Lee SY
Anaerobe; 2016 Aug; 40():68-72. PubMed ID: 27282799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease.
Landry ML; Ferguson D; Topal J
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 52(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 24226924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Diagnosis of infections caused by Clostridium difficile in the Czech Republic: availability, possibilities, and interpretation of laboratory results].
Krůtová M; Nyč O
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 2015 Jun; 64(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 26099613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.
Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium.
Olling A; Leidinger H; Hoffmann R
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Oct; 35(10):1655-9. PubMed ID: 27323765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.
Savolainen R; Koskinen JM; Mentula S; Koskinen JO; Kaukoranta SS
J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 31941691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.
Sandlund J; Mills R; Griego-Fullbright C; Wagner A; Estis J; Bartolome A; Almazan A; Tam S; Biscocho S; Abusali S; Nolan N; Bishop JJ; Todd J; Young S
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Sep; 95(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 31129008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Reller ME; Lema CA; Perl TM; Cai M; Ross TL; Speck KA; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 45(11):3601-5. PubMed ID: 17804652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
Bamber AI; Fitzsimmons K; Cunniffe JG; Beasor CC; Mackintosh CA; Hobbs G
Br J Biomed Sci; 2012; 69(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 23057158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of TechLab C. DIFF QUIK CHEK and TechLab C. DIFFICILE TOX A/B II for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples.
Reyes RC; John MA; Ayotte DL; Covacich A; Milburn S; Hussain Z
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Sep; 59(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 17662566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Low sensitivity of fecal toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection in immunocompromised patients.
Erb S; Frei R; Strandén AM; Dangel M; Tschudin-Sutter S; Widmer AF
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2015 Nov; 21(11):998.e9-998.e15. PubMed ID: 26232535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in pediatric stool samples: an evaluation of Quik Check Complete Antigen assay, BD GeneOhm Cdiff PCR, and ProGastro Cd PCR assays.
Selvaraju SB; Gripka M; Estes K; Nguyen A; Jackson MA; Selvarangan R
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Nov; 71(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 21899975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Algorithm proposal based on the C. Diff Quik Chek Complete ICT device for detecting Clostridium difficile infection.
Orellana-Miguel MA; Alcolea-Medina A; Barrado-Blanco L; Rodriguez-Otero J; Chaves-Sánchez F
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2013 Feb; 31(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 22341752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of GeneXpert PCR to BD GeneOhm for detecting C. difficile toxin gene in GDH positive toxin negative samples.
Agaronov M; Karak SG; Maldonado Y; Tetreault J; Aslanzadeh J
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2012; 42(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 23090736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Baker I; Leeming JP; Reynolds R; Ibrahim I; Darley E
J Hosp Infect; 2013 Aug; 84(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 23831282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.
Snell H; Ramos M; Longo S; John M; Hussain Z
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4863-5. PubMed ID: 15472364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.
Shah MD; Balada-Llasat JM; Coe K; Reed E; Sandlund J; Pancholi P
J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Apr; 58(5):. PubMed ID: 32051264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.
Boyanton BL; Sural P; Loomis CR; Pesta C; Gonzalez-Krellwitz L; Robinson-Dunn B; Riska P
J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 50(3):640-5. PubMed ID: 22189114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
