These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30232625)

  • 1. Evaluation of the efficacy of calcium silicate vs. glass ionomer cement indirect pulp capping and restoration assessment criteria: a randomised controlled clinical trial-2-year results.
    Hashem D; Mannocci F; Patel S; Manoharan A; Watson TF; Banerjee A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1931-1939. PubMed ID: 30232625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the efficacy of calcium silicate indirect pulp capping: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Hashem D; Mannocci F; Patel S; Manoharan A; Brown JE; Watson TF; Banerjee A
    J Dent Res; 2015 Apr; 94(4):562-8. PubMed ID: 25710953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of Biodentine, Calcium Hydroxide, and 2% Chlorhexidine with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials in Young Permanent Molars.
    Kaul S; Kumar A; Jasrotia A; Gorkha K; Kumari S; Jeri SY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 May; 22(5):511-516. PubMed ID: 34318769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled clinical trial of the performance of three bioactive endodontic cements in primary molar teeth diagnosed with reversible pulpitis: 1-year follow-up study.
    Kayaci ŞT; Yazici ZS; Kınıkoğlu İ; Özüdoğru S; Arslan H
    J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105378. PubMed ID: 39384060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gingival Health Around Cervical Carious Lesions Restored with Calcium Silicate-based Cement (Biodentine™) Compared with Glass-ionomer Cement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Habashneh RA; Qabaha M; Khader Y; Ghassib I; Atmeh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 20(6):702-706. PubMed ID: 31358713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulp management after traumatic injuries with a tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine™): a report of two cases, up to 48 months follow-up.
    Martens L; Rajasekharan S; Cauwels R
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2015 Dec; 16(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 26026789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of indirect pulp capping using three different materials: A randomized control trial using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Mathur VP; Dhillon JK; Logani A; Kalra G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):623-629. PubMed ID: 28169260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp capping with three different materials: a 2-year follow-up study.
    Gurcan AT; Seymen F
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2019 Jun; 20(2):105-110. PubMed ID: 31246084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LIGHT-CURED CALCIUM SILICATE BASED-CEMENTS AS PULP THERAPEUTIC AGENTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL STUDIES.
    García-Mota LF; Hardan L; Bourgi R; Zamarripa-Calderón JE; Rivera-Gonzaga JA; Hernández-Cabanillas JC; Cuevas-Suárez CE
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2022 Dec; 22(4):101776. PubMed ID: 36494107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration.
    Hashem DF; Foxton R; Manoharan A; Watson TF; Banerjee A
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 24418628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer serving both as indirect pulp therapy and as restorative material for primary molars.
    Kotsanos N; Arizos S
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jun; 12(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 21640064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glass-ionomer and calcium silicate-based cements interactions with human dentine in health and disease: Two-photon fluorescence microscopy and Raman spectroscopy analysis.
    Sajini S; Atmeh AR; Banerjee A; Festy F; Cook RJ; Andiappan M; Watson TF
    Dent Mater; 2022 Nov; 38(11):1710-1720. PubMed ID: 36123189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective Removal to Soft Dentine versus Full Pulpotomy for Management of Proximal Deep Carious Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.
    R R; Wani W; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Kalaivani M; Logani A
    Caries Res; 2023; 57(4):536-545. PubMed ID: 37552970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing modified USPHS and FDI criteria for the assessment of glass ionomer restorations in primary molars utilising clinical and photographic evaluation.
    Larasati N; Rizal MF; Fauziah E
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2024 Jun; 25(3):367-373. PubMed ID: 38598166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.