170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30232845)
1. Validation of optical properties quantification with a dual-step technique for biological tissue analysis.
Sorgato V; Berger M; Emain C; Vever-Bizet C; Dinten JM; Bourg-Heckly G; Planat-Chrétien A
J Biomed Opt; 2018 Sep; 23(9):1-14. PubMed ID: 30232845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ACA-Pro: calibration protocol for quantitative diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Validation on contact and noncontact probe- and CCD-based systems.
Sorgato V; Berger M; Emain C; Vever-Bizet C; Dinten JM; Bourg-Heckly G; Planat-Chrétien A
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Jun; 21(6):65003. PubMed ID: 27281063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of probe geometry and optical properties on the sampling depth for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Hennessy R; Goth W; Sharma M; Markey MK; Tunnell JW
J Biomed Opt; 2014; 19(10):107002. PubMed ID: 25349033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fiber-optic probe design and optical property recovery algorithm for optical biopsy of brain tissue.
Cappon DJ; Farrell TJ; Fang Q; Hayward JE
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Oct; 18(10):107004. PubMed ID: 24121732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with a self-calibrating fiber optic probe.
Yu B; Fu H; Bydlon T; Bender JE; Ramanujam N
Opt Lett; 2008 Aug; 33(16):1783-5. PubMed ID: 18709086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hyperspectral diffuse reflectance imaging for rapid, noncontact measurement of the optical properties of turbid materials.
Qin J; Lu R
Appl Opt; 2006 Nov; 45(32):8366-73. PubMed ID: 17068584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Continuous Wave Spectroscopy with Diffusion Theory for Quantification of Optical Properties: Comparison Between Multi-distance and Multi-wavelength Data Fitting Methods.
Lin YC; Lin ZF; Nioka S; Chen LH; Tseng SH; Chung PC
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 923():337-343. PubMed ID: 27526161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sampling depth of a diffuse reflectance spectroscopy probe for in-vivo physiological quantification of murine subcutaneous tumor allografts.
Greening G; Mundo A; Rajaram N; Muldoon TJ
J Biomed Opt; 2018 Aug; 23(8):1-14. PubMed ID: 30152204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo-based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties. Part I: Theory and validation on synthetic phantoms.
Palmer GM; Ramanujam N
Appl Opt; 2006 Feb; 45(5):1062-71. PubMed ID: 16512550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanically switchable solid inhomogeneous phantom for performance tests in diffuse imaging and spectroscopy.
Pifferi A; Torricelli A; Cubeddu R; Quarto G; Re R; Sekar SK; Spinelli L; Farina A; Martelli F; Wabnitz H
J Biomed Opt; 2015 Dec; 20(12):121304. PubMed ID: 26220211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy characterization of hemoglobin and intralipid solutions: in vitro measurements with continuous variation of absorption and scattering.
Hernández SE; Rodríguez VD; Pérez J; Martín FA; Castellano MA; Gonzalez-Mora JL
J Biomed Opt; 2009; 14(3):034026. PubMed ID: 19566319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantoms for diffuse optical imaging based on totally absorbing objects, part 2: experimental implementation.
Martelli F; Di Ninni P; Zaccanti G; Contini D; Spinelli L; Torricelli A; Cubeddu R; Wabnitz H; Mazurenka M; Macdonald R; Sassaroli A; Pifferi A
J Biomed Opt; 2014; 19(7):076011. PubMed ID: 25023415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method using in vivo quantitative spectroscopy to guide design and optimization of low-cost, compact clinical imaging devices: emulation and evaluation of multispectral imaging systems.
Saager RB; Baldado ML; Rowland RA; Kelly KM; Durkin AJ
J Biomed Opt; 2018 Apr; 23(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 29633609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reflectance-based determination of optical properties in highly attenuating tissue.
Pfefer TJ; Matchette LS; Bennett CL; Gall JA; Wilke JN; Durkin AJ; Ediger MN
J Biomed Opt; 2003 Apr; 8(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 12683846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy as a tool to measure the absorption coefficient in skin: system calibration.
Karsten AE; Singh A; Karsten PA; Braun MW
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Feb; 28(2):437-44. PubMed ID: 22410734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface layering properties of Intralipid phantoms.
Bodenschatz N; Krauter P; Foschum F; Nothelfer S; Liemert A; Simon E; Kröner S; Kienle A
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):1171-83. PubMed ID: 25590919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential weighted Wiener estimation for extraction of key tissue parameters in color imaging: a phantom study.
Chen S; Lin X; Zhu C; Liu Q
J Biomed Opt; 2014 Dec; 19(12):127001. PubMed ID: 25467524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo lookup table-based inverse model for extracting optical properties from tissue-simulating phantoms using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Hennessy R; Lim SL; Markey MK; Tunnell JW
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Mar; 18(3):037003. PubMed ID: 23455965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate extraction of optical properties and top layer thickness of two-layered mucosal tissue phantoms from spatially resolved reflectance spectra.
Sung KB; Shih KW; Hsu FW; Hsieh HP; Chuang MJ; Hsiao YH; Su YH; Tien GH
J Biomed Opt; 2014; 19(7):77002. PubMed ID: 25027003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing the sensitivity to scattering coefficient of the epithelium in a two-layered tissue model by oblique optical fibers: Monte Carlo study.
Sung KB; Chen HH
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Oct; 17(10):107003. PubMed ID: 23047254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
