These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30233482)

  • 1. A Machine Learning Approach to Perfusion Imaging With Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR.
    McKinley R; Hung F; Wiest R; Liebeskind DS; Scalzo F
    Front Neurol; 2018; 9():717. PubMed ID: 30233482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward fully automated processing of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI for acute ischemic cerebral stroke.
    Kim J; Leira EC; Callison RC; Ludwig B; Moritani T; Magnotta VA; Madsen MT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 May; 98(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 20060614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cerebral blood flow estimation from perfusion-weighted MRI using FT-based MMSE filtering method.
    Sakoglu U; Sood R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 26(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 18158225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SPINNED: Simulation-based physics-informed neural network for deconvolution of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion data.
    Asaduddin M; Kim EY; Park SH
    Magn Reson Med; 2024 Sep; 92(3):1205-1218. PubMed ID: 38623911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perfusion Maps Acquired From Dynamic Angiography MRI Using Deep Learning Approaches.
    Asaduddin M; Roh HG; Kim HJ; Kim EY; Park SH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Feb; 57(2):456-469. PubMed ID: 35726646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical properties of cerebral CT perfusion imaging systems. Part II. Deconvolution-based systems.
    Li K; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4881-4897. PubMed ID: 31495935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of perfusion MRI in stroke: To deconvolve, or not to deconvolve.
    Meijs M; Christensen S; Lansberg MG; Albers GW; Calamante F
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1282-90. PubMed ID: 26519871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Localized prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI datasets.
    Grosser M; Gellißen S; Borchert P; Sedlacik J; Nawabi J; Fiehler J; Forkert ND
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241917. PubMed ID: 33152045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DSC perfusion MRI-Quantification and reduction of systematic errors arising in areas of reduced cerebral blood flow.
    Carpenter TK; Armitage PA; Bastin ME; Wardlaw JM
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jun; 55(6):1342-9. PubMed ID: 16683256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust dynamic susceptibility contrast MR perfusion using 4D nonlinear noise filters.
    Kosior JC; Kosior RK; Frayne R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1514-22. PubMed ID: 17968968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying the transient error reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of the cerebral blood flow.
    Salluzzi M; Smith MR; Frayne R
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():1092-5. PubMed ID: 17271873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mathematical Framework of Deconvolution Algorithms for Quantification of Perfusion Parameters.
    Yang F; Bal SSB; Sung YF; Peng GS
    Acta Neurol Taiwan; 2020 Sep; 29(3)():79-85. PubMed ID: 32996115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep Learning Detection of Penumbral Tissue on Arterial Spin Labeling in Stroke.
    Wang K; Shou Q; Ma SJ; Liebeskind D; Qiao XJ; Saver J; Salamon N; Kim H; Yu Y; Xie Y; Zaharchuk G; Scalzo F; Wang DJJ
    Stroke; 2020 Feb; 51(2):489-497. PubMed ID: 31884904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies.
    Smith MR; Lu H; Trochet S; Frayne R
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Mar; 51(3):631-4. PubMed ID: 15004809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tmax Determined Using a Bayesian Estimation Deconvolution Algorithm Applied to Bolus Tracking Perfusion Imaging: A Digital Phantom Validation Study.
    Uwano I; Sasaki M; Kudo K; Boutelier T; Kameda H; Mori F; Yamashita F
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Jan; 16(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 27001394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of MRI IVIM and MR perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion.
    Zhu G; Federau C; Wintermark M; Chen H; Marcellus DG; Martin BW; Heit JJ
    Int J Stroke; 2020 Apr; 15(3):332-342. PubMed ID: 31480940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AIFNet: Automatic vascular function estimation for perfusion analysis using deep learning.
    de la Rosa E; Sima DM; Menze B; Kirschke JS; Robben D
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Dec; 74():102211. PubMed ID: 34425318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-based 4D digital breast phantom for perfusion contrast-enhanced breast CT imaging.
    Caballo M; Mann R; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4448-4460. PubMed ID: 30151857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining reperfusion post endovascular therapy in ischemic stroke using MR-dynamic contrast enhanced perfusion.
    d'Esterre CD; Sah RG; Assis Z; Talai AS; Demchuk AM; Hill MD; Goyal M; Lee TY; Forkert ND; Barber PA
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 93(1116):20190890. PubMed ID: 32941770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.