BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30234800)

  • 1. Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting.
    Hirsch BP; Khechen B; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(8):E494-E499. PubMed ID: 30234800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Iyer S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 30562332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve.
    Ahn J; Iqbal A; Manning BT; Leblang S; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Singh K
    Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 26235463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary Versus Revision Single-level Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Narcotic Utilization.
    Ahn J; Tabaraee E; Bohl DD; Aboushaala K; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Sep; 40(18):E1025-30. PubMed ID: 25955188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy.
    Wong AP; Shih P; Smith TR; Slimack NP; Dahdaleh NS; Aoun SG; El Ahmadieh TY; Smith ZA; Scheer JK; Koski TR; Liu JC; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):634-40. PubMed ID: 24239738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
    Carroll AH; Dowlati E; Molina E; Zhao D; Altshuler M; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jul; 35(4):460-470. PubMed ID: 34271544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression in an ambulatory surgery center.
    Patel DV; Yoo JS; Karmarkar SS; Lamoutte EH; Singh K
    J Spine Surg; 2019 Sep; 5(Suppl 2):S166-S173. PubMed ID: 31656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Greater Body Mass Index Increase the Risk for Revision Procedures Following a Single-Level Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy?
    Bohl DD; Ahn J; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Tabaraee E; Sershon RA; Basques BA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 27128255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk Factors for a Long Hospital Stay Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Bawa MS; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Feb; 32(1):E56-E59. PubMed ID: 30222621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-Endoscopic Assisted Lumbar Decompressive Surgery Performed in an Outpatient, Ambulatory Facility: Report of 5 Years of Complications and Risk Factors.
    Kamson S; Trescot AM; Sampson PD; Zhang Y
    Pain Physician; 2017 Feb; 20(2):E221-E231. PubMed ID: 28158159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.
    Yao Y; Zhang H; Wu J; Liu H; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Zhou Y
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():89-95. PubMed ID: 27919762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex Differences on Postoperative Pain and Disability Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy.
    Patel DV; Yoo JS; Karmarkar SS; Lamoutte EH; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Dec; 32(10):E444-E448. PubMed ID: 31162188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Phan K; Mobbs RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E91-E100. PubMed ID: 26555839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Complications, Length of Stay, and Direct Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Bawa MS; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Lalehzarian SP; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(5):363-368. PubMed ID: 30095793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Narcotic Consumption Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Comparison Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Bawa MS; Patel DV; Bawa HS; Massel DH; Mayo BC; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Int J Spine Surg; 2019 Apr; 13(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 31131216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
    Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.