162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30235003)
1. Scoring Depression on a Common Metric: A Comparison of EAP Estimation, Plausible Value Imputation, and Full Bayesian IRT Modeling.
Fischer HF; Rose M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 30235003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. www.common-metrics.org: a web application to estimate scores from different patient-reported outcome measures on a common scale.
Fischer HF; Rose M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):142. PubMed ID: 27760525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.
Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of the PROMIS depression and anxiety common metrics in an online sample of Australian adults.
Sunderland M; Batterham P; Calear A; Carragher N
Qual Life Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2453-2458. PubMed ID: 29872956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item parameters of a common metric resulted in similar depression scores compared to independent item response theory model reestimation.
Liegl G; Wahl I; Berghöfer A; Nolte S; Pieh C; Rose M; Fischer F
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 71():25-34. PubMed ID: 26475569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardization of depression measurement: a common metric was developed for 11 self-report depression measures.
Wahl I; Löwe B; Bjorner JB; Fischer F; Langs G; Voderholzer U; Aita SA; Bergemann N; Brähler E; Rose M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 24262771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Short Note on Obtaining Point Estimates of the IRT Ability Parameter With MCMC Estimation in Mplus: How Many Plausible Values Are Needed?
Luo Y; Dimitrov DM
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 30911193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: an examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks.
Zhao Y
Qual Life Res; 2017 Mar; 26(3):555-564. PubMed ID: 27909853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as an assessment instrument for symptoms of depression in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Sjonnesen K; Berzins S; Fiest KM; M Bulloch AG; Metz LM; Thombs BD; Patten SB
Postgrad Med; 2012 Sep; 124(5):69-77. PubMed ID: 23095427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in screening stroke patients for symptoms: Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis.
Ayis SA; Ayerbe L; Ashworth M; DA Wolfe C
J Affect Disord; 2018 Mar; 228():33-40. PubMed ID: 29202444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response pattern of depressive symptoms among college students: What lies behind items of the Beck Depression Inventory-II?
de Sá Junior AR; de Andrade AG; Andrade LH; Gorenstein C; Wang YP
J Affect Disord; 2018 Jul; 234():124-130. PubMed ID: 29525353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Approach to Addressing Multiple Imputation Model Uncertainty Using Bayesian Model Averaging.
Kaplan D; Yavuz S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):553-567. PubMed ID: 31538505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales.
Bjorner JB; Kosinski M; Ware JE
Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):981-1002. PubMed ID: 14651417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of sensitivity-specificity imputation, direct imputation and fully Bayesian analysis to adjust for exposure misclassification when validation data are unavailable.
Corbin M; Haslett S; Pearce N; Maule M; Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 46(3):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 28338966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Translating CESD-20 and PHQ-9 Scores to PROMIS Depression.
Kim J; Chung H; Askew RL; Park R; Jones SM; Cook KF; Amtmann D
Assessment; 2017 Apr; 24(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 26423348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of cross-calibration methods on the interpretation of a treatment comparison study using 2 depression scales.
Fischer HF; Wahl I; Fliege H; Klapp BF; Rose M
Med Care; 2012 Apr; 50(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 22422054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian Modal Estimation of the Four-Parameter Item Response Model in Real, Realistic, and Idealized Data Sets.
Waller NG; Feuerstahler L
Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 28306347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multilevel Reliability Measures of Latent Scores Within an Item Response Theory Framework.
Cho SJ; Shen J; Naveiras M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):856-881. PubMed ID: 31215245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.
Terluin B; Smits N; Brouwers EP; de Vet HC
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Sep; 14(1):130. PubMed ID: 27629535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
