These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30235014)

  • 1. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies.
    Melman T; de Winter JC; Abbink DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():372-387. PubMed ID: 27865119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1324-39. PubMed ID: 17558672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is improved lane keeping during cognitive load caused by increased physical arousal or gaze concentration toward the road center?
    Li P; Markkula G; Li Y; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():65-74. PubMed ID: 29656076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does attention capacity moderate the effect of driver distraction in older drivers?
    Cuenen A; Jongen EM; Brijs T; Brijs K; Lutin M; Van Vlierden K; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():12-20. PubMed ID: 25667202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
    Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation.
    Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Trotter MJ; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):583-91. PubMed ID: 20869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lane keeping under cognitive load: performance changes and mechanisms.
    He J; McCarley JS; Kramer AF
    Hum Factors; 2014 Mar; 56(2):414-26. PubMed ID: 24689258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving Performance After Self-Regulated Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1233-1248. PubMed ID: 28902526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control.
    Melnicuk V; Thompson S; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105967. PubMed ID: 33444868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():389-95. PubMed ID: 26141907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of human-machine interface modality, specificity, and timing on driver performance and behavior while using vehicle automation.
    Wang M; Parker J; Wong N; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC; Kim W; Romo A; Horrey WJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107606. PubMed ID: 38733810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.