200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30236767)
1. Analysis of endoscopic features for histologic discrepancies between biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasms: 10-year results.
Noh CK; Jung MW; Shin SJ; Ahn JY; Cho HJ; Yang MJ; Kim SS; Lim SG; Lee D; Kim YB; Cheong JY; Lee KM; Yoo BM; Lee KJ
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Jan; 51(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 30236767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic features suggesting gastric cancer in biopsy-proven gastric adenoma with high-grade neoplasia.
Kim JH; Kim YJ; An J; Lee JJ; Cho JH; Kim KO; Chung JW; Kwon KA; Park DK; Kim JH
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 20(34):12233-40. PubMed ID: 25232257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for under-diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic forceps biopsy in comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Chinese patients.
Xu G; Zhang W; Lv Y; Zhang B; Sun Q; Ling T; Zhang X; Zhou Z; Wang L; Huang Q; Zou X
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2716-22. PubMed ID: 26423416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma among lesions diagnosed as low-grade adenoma/dysplasia on endoscopic biopsy: A multicenter, prospective, observational study.
Maekawa A; Kato M; Nakamura T; Komori M; Yamada T; Yamamoto K; Ogiyama H; Nakahara M; Kawai N; Yabuta T; Mukai A; Hayashi Y; Nishida T; Iijima H; Tsujii M; Morii E; Takehara T
Dig Endosc; 2018 Mar; 30(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 29094455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors suggesting an underestimation of gastric lesions initially diagnosed as adenomas by forceps biopsy.
Ko SJ; Yang MA; Yun SH; Park MS; Han SH; Cho JW
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 27015616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies Between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms.
Aliaga Ramos J; Pedrosa MS; Yoshida N; Abdul Rani R; Arantes VN
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Jan; 57(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 33883515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathologic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasia.
Ryu DG; Choi CW; Kang DH; Kim HW; Park SB; Kim SJ; Nam HS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(33):e11802. PubMed ID: 30113468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic characteristics of gastric adenomas suggesting carcinomatous transformation.
Jung MK; Jeon SW; Park SY; Cho CM; Tak WY; Kweon YO; Kim SK; Choi YH; Bae HI
Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18401651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosa dissection for high-grade dysplasia from endoscopic forceps biopsy.
Ryu DG; Choi CW; Kang DH; Kim HW; Park SB; Kim SJ; Nam HS
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jul; 20(4):671-678. PubMed ID: 27822683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic role of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions with indefinite pathology.
Lee H; Kim H; Shin SK; Park JC; Lee SK; Lee YC; Kim H; Noh SH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Sep; 47(8-9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 22793876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical features of negative pathologic results after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Jeong DI; Kim HW; Choi CW; Kang DH; Park SB; Kim SJ; Nam HS
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1163-1171. PubMed ID: 27405480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histologic diagnosis based on forceps biopsy is not adequate for determining endoscopic treatment of gastric adenomatous lesions.
Kim YJ; Park JC; Kim JH; Shin SK; Lee SK; Lee YC; Chung JB
Endoscopy; 2010 Aug; 42(8):620-6. PubMed ID: 20623445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric adenomatous polyps: predictive factors for early gastric cancer.
Choi CW; Kang DH; Kim HW; Park SB; Kim S; Cho M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 47(10):1218-25. PubMed ID: 22839759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens.
Sung HY; Cheung DY; Cho SH; Kim JI; Park SH; Han JY; Park GS; Kim JK; Chung IS
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Feb; 21(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 19092673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectrum of final pathological diagnosis of gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection.
Nam KW; Song KS; Lee HY; Lee BS; Seong JK; Kim SH; Moon HS; Lee ES; Jeong HY
World J Gastroenterol; 2011 Dec; 17(47):5177-83. PubMed ID: 22215942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Is Most Important to the Endoscopist for Therapeutic Plan? Morphology
Baek IH; Kim KO; Choi MH; Jung SW; Jang HJ; Min KW
Am Surg; 2018 May; 84(5):644-651. PubMed ID: 29966563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection].
Kwon MJ; Park JJ; Yun JW; Noh HJ; Yoon DW; Chang WJ; Oh HY; Kim BH; Lee H; Joo MK; Lee BJ; Kim JH; Yeon JE; Kim JS; Byun KS; Bak YT
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 59(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 22460569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting pre- and post-resectional histologic discrepancies in gastric low-grade dysplasia: A comparison of white-light and magnifying endoscopy.
Hwang JW; Bae YS; Kang MS; Kim JH; Jee SR; Lee SH; An MS; Kim KH; Bae KB; Kim B; Seol SY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Feb; 31(2):394-402. PubMed ID: 26474082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Commonly Is the Diagnosis of Gastric Low Grade Dysplasia Upgraded following Endoscopic Resection? A Meta-Analysis.
Zhao G; Xue M; Hu Y; Lai S; Chen S; Wang L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132699. PubMed ID: 26182344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens.
Hong J; Wang Y; Deng J; Qi M; Zuo W; Hao Y; Wang A; Tu Y; Xu S; Zhou X; Zhou X; Li G; Zhu L; Shu X; Zhu Y; Lv N; Chen Y
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1915458. PubMed ID: 35707387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]