These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Development of a low-dose protocol for cone beam CT examinations of the anterior maxilla in children. Hidalgo Rivas JA; Horner K; Thiruvenkatachari B; Davies J; Theodorakou C Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150559. PubMed ID: 26279087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy. Pauwels R; Pittayapat P; Sinpitaksakul P; Panmekiate S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20200597. PubMed ID: 33882256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accounting for patient size in the optimization of dose and image quality of pelvis cone beam CT protocols on the Varian OBI system. Wood TJ; Moore CS; Horsfield CJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1055):20150364. PubMed ID: 26419892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Experimental study on the feasibility of low-dose cone beam computed tomography scanning]. Shi X; Li SJ; Zhou JP; Zhang L Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 38(4):415-418. PubMed ID: 32865361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency. Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Determination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysis. Weerawanich W; Shimizu M; Takeshita Y; Okamura K; Yoshida S; Jasa GR; Yoshiura K Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 35(3):260-271. PubMed ID: 30484205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artefacts at different distances from titanium and zirconia implants in cone-beam computed tomography: effect of tube current and metal artefact reduction. Mancini AXM; Santos MUC; Gaêta-Araujo H; Tirapelli C; Pauwels R; Oliveira-Santos C Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):5087-5094. PubMed ID: 33544197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Initial Assessment of a Prototype 3D Cone-Beam Computed Tomography System for Imaging of the Lumbar Spine, Evaluating Human Cadaveric Specimens in the Upright Position. Benz RM; Harder D; Amsler F; Voigt J; Fieselmann A; Falkowski AL; Stieltjes B; Hirschmann A Invest Radiol; 2018 Dec; 53(12):714-719. PubMed ID: 30001256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing the target detectability of cone beam CT performed in image-guided radiation therapy for patients of different body sizes. Yang CC; Yu PC; Ruan JM; Chen YC J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):310-317. PubMed ID: 29516610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of exposure parameters on the detection of simulated root fractures in the presence of various intracanal materials. Pinto MGO; Rabelo KA; Sousa Melo SL; Campos PSF; Oliveira LSAF; Bento PM; Melo DP Int Endod J; 2017 Jun; 50(6):586-594. PubMed ID: 27132802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Projection Quality-Driven Tube Current Modulation Method in Cone-Beam CT for IGRT: Proof of Concept. Men K; Dai J Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1179-1186. PubMed ID: 29332447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]